Search for: "Allen v. Price*" Results 81 - 100 of 323
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
There were 11 judgments after the trials of preliminary issues in libel cases Spicer v Commissioner of Police of Metropolis [2019] EWHC 1439 (QB) Travel Insurance Facilities v Times [2019] EWHC 1337 (QB) Allen v Times Newspapers [2019] EWHC 1235 (QB) Feyziyev v The Journalism Development Network Association [2019] EWHC 957 (QB) Rochester v Ingham House Ltd [2019] EWHC 847 (QB) Hewson v Times Newspapers Ltd [2019] EWHC 650 (QB) Poroshenko… [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 5:41 am by Caroline Shaw
The chapters will, in turn, foreground gender and the sexual slander of women; group defamation – or, the protection of individual v. community; and biography, reputation and the (post)imperial nation. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 7:50 am by Mitu Gulati
Sovereign debt guru and Allen & Overy partner, Yannis Manuelides has a new paper (here) out on the “local law advantage” in Euro area sovereign bonds. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:04 pm
  David Por (Allen & Overy) explained that the Paris Appeal Court had addressed this in LG v Conversant: the implementer does not have to produce its licences. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette has covered Ofcom’s recent sanction of LBC after presenter Steve Allen for mocking a blind BBC journalist’s provision of a guide horse. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Council of State Governments Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen looks at the recent cert grant PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Freed applies an alternative “commencement” of the statute of limitations found in McCoy v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
Last up is Wright v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Some view property tax limitations as a sensible constraint on the growth of government, or as a fail-safe to avoid pricing people out of their own homes. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Defendant established its entitlement to dismissal on statute of limitation grounds by submitting evidence that the malpractice occurred in 2008, but plaintiff did not commence this action until March 2016, well beyond the three-year limitation period for legal malpractice (CPLR 214[6]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002]; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541 [1994]; Glamm v Allen, 57 NY2d 87, 93 [1982]). [read post]