Search for: "Allstate Insurance Company v. the United States" Results 81 - 100 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 7:18 pm
Co., 37 AD3d 436 [2007]; United States Fid. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:02 am by Emily Hammond
Allstate Insurance Co. rejected the relevance of a state legislature’s subjective intentions when it held that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure trumped a New York law prohibiting certain kinds of class actions. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 6:14 am by Chip Merlin
These may include data analytics, social media monitoring, and referral to special investigation units. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:13 am by Vivian Persand
The experts in the field provide examples of programs that have been used by insurers such as the following: “CCPR” (Claim Core Processing Re-Design) for Allstate; Quantum Leap for Safeco and State Farm; and “ACE” (Advancing Claims Excellence or Accelerating Claims Excellence - depending on who you ask) for Nationwide. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:10 am
APPELLATE DIVISIONFIRST DEPARTMENTInsurance Law‘Follow-the-Fortunes Doctrine' Inapplicable; Insurer Differently Calculated Loss Against Insured, Reinsurer Allstate Insurance Co., plaintiff-appellant v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 12:07 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Fraud Conviction Upheld but Restitution Order Erred in Precluding Joint and Several Liability United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:08 am
Allstate Insurance Company: Can a state legislature properly prohibit the federal courts from using the class action device for state law claims? [read post]
Allstate Insurance Company, 536 F. 3d 418 (5th Cir. 2008), which it observed stood for the proposition that the words ‘persons’ and ‘plaintiffs’ in the mass action definition were to be defined as ‘real parties in interest. [read post]
Allstate Insurance Co.,  559 U.S. 393 (2010), that this bar does not apply in class actions in federal court because it conflicts with Rule 23, the federal rule of civil procedure governing class actions. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are:  Haygood v. [read post]