Search for: "Ambrose v. Ambrose"
Results 81 - 100
of 133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 2:57 am
Ambrose v Harris (Procurator Fiscal, Oban); HM Advocate v M; HM Advocate v G [2011] UKSC 43; [2011] WLR (D) 288 “In principle the line as to when access to legal advice had to be provided before a person suspected of a criminal offence was questioned by police should be drawn as from the moment when he had been taken into police custody, or his freedom of action had been significantly curtailed.” WLR Daily, 6th October 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am
Ambrose v Harris (Procurator Fiscal, Oban) (Scotland) Her Majesty’s Advocate v G (Scotland) Her Majesty’s Advocate v M (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 43 October 6, 2011 Supreme Court: Scottish prosecutions based on questioning by police pre-detention without access to lawyer not ECHR breach. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
Ambrose Harris (Procurator Fiscal), HM Advocate v G : HM Advocate v M [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) – read judgment Reliance on evidence that emerged from questioning a person without access to a lawyer did not invariably breach the right to a fair trial under Article 6. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
The review group, headed by Lord McCluskey, was set up by Alex Salmond after the Supreme Court decisions in Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2011] UKSC24 and in anticipation of the decisions in HM Advocate v Ambrose, G & M. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:05 am
Ambrose, 152 N.J. 383, 392-93 (1998). [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
Her Majesty’s Advocate v Ambrose, Her Majesty’s Advocate v Gorman, Her Majesty’s Advocate v McDowall and Her Majesty’s Advocate v Paterson, heard 28 – 30 June 2011. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
Her Majesty’s Advocate v Ambrose, Her Majesty’s Advocate v Gorman, Her Majesty’s Advocate v McDowall and Her Majesty’s Advocate v Paterson, heard 28 – 30 June 2011. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
Her Majesty’s Advocate v Ambrose, Her Majesty’s Advocate v Gorman, Her Majesty’s Advocate v McDowall and Her Majesty’s Advocate v Paterson, heard 28 – 30 June 2011. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:49 pm
The Fund was created in October 1918 by the widow of Stephen V. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
Her Majesty’s Advocate v Ambrose, Her Majesty’s Advocate v Gorman, Her Majesty’s Advocate v McDowall and Her Majesty’s Advocate v Paterson, heard 28 – 30 June 2011. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
The cases of Ambrose, G and M deal with various challenges that have arisen since the ruling in Cadder v HM Advocate. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
The appeals in Her Majesty’s Advocate v Ambrose, Her Majesty’s Advocate v G, Her Majesty’s Advocate v M and Her Majesty’s Advocate v P will be heard over three days commencing on Tuesday 28 June 2011 by Lords Hope, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Clarke (Scotland). [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 4:28 pm
This case has many academics and librarians very anxious.II.Association for Information Media and Equipment and Ambrose Video Publishing Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:54 pm
We've seen reports of a case called R (Ambrose) v City of Westminster (Admin Court 13 May 2011. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:54 pm
We've seen reports of a case called R (Ambrose) v City of Westminster (Admin Court 13 May 2011. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 9:32 pm
No, I didn’t get a ticket for failing to obey the new Ambrose-Searles ‘Move Over Act’ that requires drivers to exercise due care to avoid colliding with an authorized emergency vehicle which is parked, stopped or standing on the shoulder of a road or highway with its emergency lights activated. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm
Joe Touro, Annenberg School: heard rumors that Google is starting to desilo its data: Gmail v. contextual marketing etc. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm
Ambrose of the Western District of Pennsylvania said.Insurance –Coverage Dispute: 10TH CIRCUIT SAYS BAD-FAITH CLAIM NOT 'FRIVOLOUS', Blakely v. [read post]
