Search for: "Amendment To Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure"
Results 81 - 100
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2009, 2:22 am
These prosecutions have already changed the face of federal prisons. ..... 2, 2009) (discussing requirements of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11). ... [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 10:19 pm
A Lifeline… Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.151 allows a defendant to consolidate “related” cases and charges. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 6:23 pm
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:38 pm
Capping a rule-making odyssey that began in 2005, the Florida Supreme Court adopted rules on November 12, 2009, intended to expedite appellate review in dependency and parental termination cases.1 The Court’s opinion amends three bodies of rules: The Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure, and the Florida Rules of Appellate… [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:24 pm
" He warned that a "categorical rule" eliminating life in prison without parole would undermine Florida law. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:14 am
Florida (08-7621). [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
At least at the outset, it appears that two rulings, not one, are likely to emerge. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:40 pm
Florida, at 11. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:24 am
The Florida Supreme Court released the following court rule opinions:Opinions Released Mar. 19, 2009SC08_1612 - In re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile ProcedureSC08_2176 - In re: Approval of Application for Determination of Indigent Status Form For Use By Clerks and Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.984Opinions Released Mar. 5, 2009OP_SC08_1488 - In Re: Standard Jury Instructions In… [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
One defendant's sentence is remanded for resentencing where the district court committed prejudicial procedural error by calculating his advisory guideline range incorrectly. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
(Amended opinion) U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, November 07, 2008 Urcinoli v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Rounds, 530 F.3d 724, 732 (8th Cir. 2008): 1) plaintiff was likely to prove any interest the state has in protecting funeral mourners from unwanted speech was outweighed by the First Amendment right to free speech; [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
P. 23(b)(2) requirements for certification; and 4) remand was necessary for consideration of whether the proposed damages class met the Rule 23(b)(3) requirements. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Cruz-Rodriguez, No. 052492, 052493 Convictions and sentences of twenty-six defendants for crimes arising from their involvement in a large drug distribution network that operated in a Puerto Rico housing project are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient; 2) the evidence failed to implicate one defendant in any conspiracy; 3) the evidence implicated a defendant in a conspiracy different from the one charged; and 4) district court committed a host of errors, mostly… [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Leveto, No. 05-4753 Conviction for federal income tax fraud is affirmed where: 1) defendant had knowingly and voluntarily waived his Sixth Amendment right to counsel and, once properly waived, this right is no longer absolute; and 2) there was no reversible error in several rulings regarding a warrant and summons. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Bonin, No. 07-30827 In a case involving an individual previously arrested for making threats to country music singer George Strait and later for threats to a magistrate judge, an order committing defendant to the custody of the Attorney General pursuant to a dangerousness determination is vacated and remanded where the determination contravened the requisite statutory procedure. . [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Wecht, No. 07-4767 In a trial accusing a public official of misusing his office for private financial gain, an order to withhold from the public the names and addresses of prospective and trial jurors is vacated where: 1) the collateral order doctrine granted jurisdiction to hear the appeal; 2) intervenors-media companies had standing to challenge the order; 3) there is a presumptive First Amendment right to obtain the names of jurors prior to empanelment, which was not overcome here; but… [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
Despite the Supreme Court's 1976 ruling in Gregg v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Smith, No. 06-3112 In a case addressing the constitutionality of a vehicle impoundment under the Fourth Amendment in circumstances in which there was no standardized policy regarding the impoundment and towing of vehicles, the circuit court rules that the constitutionality of a community caretaking impoundment is judged by directly applying the Fourth Amendment, which protects people against "unreasonable" searches and seizures. [read post]
