Search for: "American Home Assurance Co. v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2012, 10:08 am by Christopher Sagers
  The Supreme Court has made clear in Community Communications Co., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica)   Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP)   Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More importantly, they state that it is medically desirable to do so. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm by Laurence Tribe
  In the landmark case of Wickard v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:50 pm by David Harlow
  If you need to get your bearings, feel free to peruse previous HealthBlawg-hosted editions of Blawg Review: #88, #129, #154 and #211.John Adams is a person of interest for this edition, because he made his home in Quincy, MA.Quincy is a point of interest because not only did Adams give it to his son as a middle name, it also happens to be the home of the longest-running Flag Day parade and celebration in these United States. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:04 pm by Berin Szoka
  If the FCC gets its way and is able to grant itself new jurisdiction over broadband by declaring it a “telecommunications service” under Title II, with or without forbearance, all broadband connections will become subject to USF contributions.[12] According to the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), the average subscription price for broadband in the United States in 2009 was $49.25 a month.[13] Applying the 15.3% contribution… [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
  Tozzi notes that "Between 2002 and 2007, the number of American farms increased by 76,000, according to the latest data from the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm by Bexis
  Ali is another such case:By its own terms, however, the VCPA does not apply to “[a]ny aspect of a consumer transaction which aspect is authorized under laws or regulations of this Commonwealth or the United States, or the formal advisory opinions of any regulatory body or official of this Commonwealth or the United States. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
It is perhaps ironic that Wigmore has had far more staying power in Canada than in his home country, the United States. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Chairman Schapiro further stated that the end of the program was designed “to expedite the Commission’s enforcement efforts and ensure that justice is swiftly served. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]