Search for: "Ames v. Baker" Results 81 - 100 of 477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Adam Wagner
If the appeal is successful, Mr Justice Baker has agreed to reconsider his decision on costs. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:08 pm by Amy Howe
The justices’ failure to act on Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 2:48 pm by Bill Araiza
Having completed another round of exam grading (including, on an Admin Law exam, a delightful misidentification of Vermont Yankee v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 2:34 pm
The Salt Lake Tribune has an overview of the dispute in Pleasant Grove City, UT v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:25 am by Isabel McArdle
The Court of Appeal, citing Cumming Bruce LJ in Clarke-Hunt v Newcombe (1982) 4 FLR 482, emphasised that to overturn a best interest finding, it must plainly be the wrong answer: I am sitting in the Court of Appeal deciding a quite different question: has it been shown that the judge to whom Parliament has confided the exercise of discretion, plainly got the wrong answer? [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 8:45 am by emagraken
  Again, the timing of this attempt was unclear. [105]     I am prepared to accept that for a short time after the March 2012 accident, Mr. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by Dennis Crouch
First, the Federal Circuit’s merger analysis is in conflict with this Court’s ruling in Baker v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:55 am
Yesterday at noon, with Dave Barshay of Baker, Sanders, Barshay, Grossman, Fass, Muhlstock & Neuwirth, LLC, sitting in his Jamaica, Queens offices, and I sitting in my Buffalo, New York offices, 127 time- and effort-vested members of the New York no-fault insurance and legal community participated in an open webinar discussion of the background, holding and impact of the New York Court of Appeals' then one-week-old decision in LMK Psychological Servs., P.C. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm by Mark Beese
I am pleased that the 2010 Legal Marketing Conference will be held in Denver, Colorado from March 10-12, 2010. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:55 am
Baker, 276 Ga. 822, 823-824 (586 SE2d 303) (2003) (Benham, J., dissenting) I am equally at a loss to comprehend why the majority would deny the petition for certiorari in this case of gravity and public importance, which also presents an issue of first impression. [read post]
27 May 2016, 5:00 am by Michael Risch
But Sega is crystal clear that we do allow interoperability reuse: “To the extent that a work is functional or factual, it may be copied,Baker v. [read post]