Search for: "Anderson v. Green" Results 81 - 100 of 196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
Although the United States Constitution does not specifically guarantee voting secrecy, Anderson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am by Rob Robinson
Design Patents Have Come - http://bit.ly/RjToW4 (Lisa Shuchman) iWin: Apple Defeats Samsung in Key Pre-Trial Motion - http://bit.ly/OzXID3 (Michael Pontrelli) Fighting Over Rectangles: Why Apple Can't Win The Patent War - http://bit.ly/OBA32j (Skylar Greene) Apple, Samsung, Dance the Courtroom Jig - Lucy Koh Hears Evidence on the Origin of the Oblong - http://bit.ly/OD3uDR (Tamlin Magee) In Apple-Samsung trial, it's John Quinn v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm by Rob Robinson
Cost – A Case for Fixed-Fee, Unit-Based Pricing – http://bit.ly/L9FILJ (Marc Zamsky) eDiscovery Case Law: Judges Get Annoyed When Lawyers Don’t Play Nice – http://bit.ly/LDquTY (Jason Krause) eDiscovery Drama: Stranger Than Fiction – http://bit.ly/QuvHvw (Matt Miller) How Early Case Assessment Can Drive Effective Arbitrations – http://bit.ly/LytKhp (Julie Anne Halter, Bill Zoellner) How To Manage The Costs Of Big Data In eDiscovery – http://bit.ly/Quv4lL… [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The original article on which this revised version is based was originally written before the initial decisio in FDIC v Perry was reported (about which decision, refer here). [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Angus McCullough QC
As David Anderson QC has remarked, we are in the territory of second best solutions. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:22 pm by Rosalind English
 So far they have been critical of the proposals, and they have recently responded to Anderson with a supplementary paper. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm by Adam Wagner
In relation to “gisting”, which is when a person is given the “gist” of the allegations against him, Anderson is concerned that the “suggestion that legislation might define the categories of case in which gisting is not required (GP §2.43) is unwelcome”. [read post]