Search for: "Andrews v. State of California"
Results 81 - 100
of 892
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Andrew J. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm
It did not happen, so competition remains strong in California, even with powerful consumer protections in place. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm
It did not happen, so competition remains strong in California, even with powerful consumer protections in place. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:35 pm
Rev. 259 (2009) Notes Andrew C. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:31 pm
The 9th held that California law applies because the state law is interpreted to apply when any partial execution of the offense occurs with the state's jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 2:09 pm
The November 16, 2020 Ruling On November 16, 2020, California (San Francisco County) Superior Court Judge Andrew Y.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 3:42 am
Andrew Siegel previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 4:03 pm
In an opinion by Andrew D. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 3:17 am
In Andrews v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Earlier this month, Judge Andrew Hanen—the Bush-appointed judge in Texas who, back in 2015, Republican state elected officials handpicked to give legal effect to their political attacks on the Obama administration’s immigration policies—issued his latest ruling invalidating DACA, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals initiative. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 9:00 pm
Siegel (California State University, Sacramento) on"The Forgotten Origins of Paid Family Leave"; Manisha Sinha (University of Connecticut) on President Donald Trump's "precursor," Andrew Johnson. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:19 pm
Those charter provisions have been upheld in a number of California state courts. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 2:49 pm
Reporting about the 7th Circuit's Sept. 24th decision in the case of Andrews v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 11:05 am
” But the position of the United States government in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:58 pm
The Court of Appeal says that "Andrew R. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 11:07 am
District Court for the Central District of California on March 9th.Yes-on-8 attorney Andrew Pugno claims that ADF seeks to intervene in the lawsuit "because the defense of California's constitutional amendment should not be entrusted to the state attorney general, who has already argued that he thinks it should be ‘invalidated.'" But Smelt v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:22 pm
” Andrew Tuohy blogs about firearms at the Vuurwapen blog (Dutch for “firearms”). [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:44 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8), and United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Writing at the Reuters News & Insight blog, Andrew Longstreth covers Wednesday’s oral argument in American Express Co. v. [read post]
