Search for: "Anthony A. May v. State of Indiana" Results 81 - 100 of 149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Likewise the State may not seek to remove a popular but disfavored product from the marketplace by prohibiting truthful, nonmisleading advertisements that contain impressive endorsements or catchy jingles. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:25 pm by Christa Culver
ShepardDocket: 10-425Issue(s): Whether various canons of the Indiana Code of Judicial Conduct that restrict speech and/or activities of state judges and judicial candidates violate the Constitution.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (7th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' reply Title: M.B.Z. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am by cdw
  The Eleventh Circuit in Troy Anthony Davis v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 1:07 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 Indiana is among the states that have challenged the constitutionality of the program; Ohio is not. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
A permanent Portuguese fort was established at Arguin in 1448, and the 1452 Dum Diversas papal bull of Pope Nicholas V specifically authorized Alfonso V of Portugal, …full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be… and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 7:57 am by Susan Brenner
The Government contends that local police used a State of Indiana subpoena to obtain the cell phone records belonging to Benford and Booker. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Justice Department, and the state of Indiana announced that Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $950,000 and install and upgrade pollution control technology at its two coal-fired power plants in Indiana to resolve violations of the Clean Air Act. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:30 pm by Erin Miller
  Justice Anthony Kennedy often decides cases in sweeping terms, even when the result is liberal, as in Lawrence v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
— Mireya Navarroa, The New York Times, December 22, 2009 Air quality in the New York tri-state region stands to benefit from a court settlement requiring Duke Energy, one of the nation’s largest electric power companies, to drastically cut sulfur dioxide emissions from a coal-fired plant in Indiana, state and federal officials said Tuesday. [read post]