Search for: "Appeal of Fisher (robert)"
Results 81 - 100
of 274
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit for reconsideration in light of the Trump administration’s recent revocation of Obama-era guidance on which the appeals court had relied. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:10 pm
The Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed his appeal from the removal order. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am
Additional coverage of Sotomayor’s dissent comes from Robert Barnes in The Washington Post. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 4:40 am
” At Forbes, Daniel Fisher reports that the court is considering whether to review a case that would trim attorney fees in class action cases, noting that the justices may “decide as early as next week whether to hear the appeal of a Sixth Circuit decision upholding a class-action settlement that distributed only $1.6 million to consumers but yielded $2.4 million for the attorneys who represented them. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 6:00 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Duran Duran To Appeal UK Decision That Spurred McCartney Suit First off today, Daniel Fisher at Forbes reports that, in the UK, Duran Duran has filed an appeal in hopes that it will be able to exercise copyright reversion, thus reclaiming its copyrights in many of its hit songs. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:53 pm
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit to the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 8:45 am
He’s an avid fly fisher who enjoys being outdoors. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 11:54 am
However, in a twist just reported by the clerk’s office, it turns out that Chief Justice Roberts did not realize that through his 1,212 shares of Thermo Fisher Scientific, that owns Life Tech, that he should have recused himself. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 12:00 am
However, in a twist just reported by the clerk’s office, it turns out that Chief Justice Roberts did not realize that through his 1,212 shares of Thermo Fisher Scientific, that owns Life Tech, that he should have recused himself. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
Tam are Mark Walsh at Education Week, Daniel Fisher at Forbes, Tony Mauro at Law.com (subscription or registration required), and Robert Barnes at The Washington Post, who reports that a “majority of the Supreme Court seemed highly skeptical” “that the federal government can refuse to register all trademarks that may be disparaging, casting this as the government improperly taking sides in free speech disputes. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 3:12 pm
Katyal for respondent (Art Lien) Breyer seemed to agree with Roberts. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
§ 1369(b)(1) gives courts of appeals (and not district courts) exclusive original jurisdiction over challenges to the Clean Water Rule. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
§ 1369(b)(1) gives courts of appeals (and not district courts) exclusive original jurisdiction over challenges to the Clean Water Rule. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am
Wade, are in far less peril than more recent decisions, such as the affirmative action case of Fisher v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:38 am
In her column in The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse observes that “Chief Justice Roberts heads a court that a harsh political spotlight has rendered too easy to dismiss as just another political branch of government, its members just politicians in robes,” and cautions that “he needs to make it clear that the Roberts court is not a tool of partisan politics. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
Gangi and Robert K. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
At ACS, Robert Smith discusses the decision, noting that it “strongly suggests that five justices on the Court” believe that a sentencer is required “to find that a juvenile is permanently incorrigible before imposing a LWOP sentence. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 2:42 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
(Last Thursday, he read at length from his dissent in Fisher v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
As the opinion explains, on 9 February 2012, defendant Robert Bishop was arrested and charged with one count of cyberbullying under North Carolina's cyberbullying statute, North Carolina General Statutes §14-458. [read post]
