Search for: "Appeal of Matthew Kennedy"
Results 81 - 100
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Hankook Ilbo, 2012 ONCA 175 the Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal against a jury finding that the words complained of were not defamatory. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:16 am
Freedom of expression The Court of Appeal (CA) in Kennedy v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 3:52 pm
Matthews Cathedral in D.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:06 am
Confidential, Matthew Kaiser of the Federal Criminal Appeals Blog, Nathan Burney of The Criminal Lawyer, Paul Kennedy of The Defense Rests, and David Benowitz of D.C. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
Todd, Steptoe & Johnson PLLC Fairview Park Matthew G. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:27 am
Kennedy 1. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:16 am
”)Gregory Kennedy: The last we heard, Justice Anthony Kennedy’s son was a managing director at Credit Suisse — ka-ching! [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:53 am
” Reviewing the factors for establishing due process protections that the Court outlined in Matthews v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:31 am
On appeal, Tapia argued unsuccessfully that Section 3582 of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 prohibited a judge from basing the length of her sentence on a rehabilitative goal. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm
Copyright 2011, Philadelphia Bar Association. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Matthew B. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:39 am
(Thanks to Howard Bashman and How Appealing for the link.) [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:53 pm
Now the case heads to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:50 am
” That approach also seemed to hold some appeal for Justice Anthony M. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:09 am
For further information, please contact John Stigi at (310) 228-3717 or Matthew Holder at (858) 720-7411. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
Writing in the “Independent” Matthew Bell discusses the settlement of the claim. suggesting that the action leaves lots of costs and no winners. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
Curiously, the majority lineup in this per curiam opinion, includes the Chief Justice and both Justices Kennedy and Alito. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:55 am
London School of Economics, MPA Princeton University Woodrow Wilson School; Kellis Parker Academic Fellow Columbia University; United States Court of Appeals, United States District Court; Legislation, Election Law Katerina Linos; JD 2006 Harvard University; PhD 2007 Harvard Political Science; Junior Fellow Society of Fellows Harvard University; International Law Matthew Jacobsmeyer; JD 1991 Harvard University Saira Mohamed; JD 2005 Columbia Univers [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:22 am
You could also ask if Kennedy wouldn’t have been President without TV. [read post]
