Search for: "Apple, Inc. v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Professional Janitorial Service, Inc. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:28 pm
Shortly after the start of the Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
From this general study, it is then possible to begin to focus more particularly on the interpretation and application of law, focusing on the role of the courts and their frameworks for statutory and constitutional interpretation. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
A decision by the Quebec Superior Court to authorize a class action to go ahead against Apple Inc. may have set the bar to a new low for certification by not first sorting out whether downloading free apps deliberately breached the privacy of users.In Gad Albilia v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:07 am
Apple, Inc., where the U.S. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:00 am
China’s Great Leap Forward in PatentsOn March 28, Apple Inc. appeared in court in Shanghai to defend charges that Siri, its voice-recognition, personal-assistant software, allegedly infringes a Chinese patent. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
Google, Inc., 2007 U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:46 am
Superior Court (Krescent), S199384). [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm
On February 4, 2013 a sharply divided California Supreme Court held in Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
” Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability) §9 (1998); accord id. at comment a (§9 “appl[ies] to commercial product sellers”). [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am
” The article discussed a no-poach agreement used by several large high tech companies (Adobe Systems, Inc., Apple Inc., Google Inc., Intel Corp., Intuit Inc. and Pixar) to refrain from soliciting the other’s employees. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:35 pm
” The court on November 7 will hear the following cases (with the issue presented as stated on the court’s website): Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
Electrical Services, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 10:02 am
Wrigley Jr. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
The Court cited Wind Power Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
The Court cited Wind Power Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
The Court cited Wind Power Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
The Court cited Wind Power Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Superior Ct., 246 P.3d 877, 895 (Cal. 2011); Clayworth v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
” (Attorney General Eric Holder, April 11, 2012) “This was competition on the merits, with Apple providing a superior reading platform on a beautiful 10 inch iPad screen, with color, multi-media, and fixed display, and access to millions of future iPad purchasers. [read post]
