Search for: "Application of Her Majesty The Queen" Results 81 - 100 of 143
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am by Laura Sandwell
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am by Laura Sandwell
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:54 am by Laura Sandwell
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:17 am by Laura Sandwell
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:51 am by Laura Sandwell
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Canada 2013 FC 832 Admiralty - Principles of law – Canadian Maritime Law – Application Les Surplus JT purchased a fishing vessel following a forfeit of the vessel to Her Majesty the Queen (Canada). [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 3:42 pm by David Fraser
Her Majesty) in connection with the massive privacy breach associated with the government’s medical marijuana program. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am by Laura Sandwell
From today listed for two days in Courtroom 1 is the appeal of Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am by Laura Sandwell
From today listed for two days in Courtroom 1 is the appeal of Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 12:28 am by Laura Sandwell
Cotter v Commissioner for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 October 2013. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:50 am by Administrator
Canada 2013 FC 590[1] Her Majesty the Queen in right of Alberta, the Minister of Justice and Solicitor General of Alberta and the Deputy Minister of Justice of Alberta (hereinafter referred to as the Alberta Crown) seek an order to strike the Second Amended Statement of Claim under Rule 221(1) of the Federal Courts Rules (FCR), on the grounds that the pleading does not disclose a reasonable cause of action (Rule 221(1)(a)), and is scandalous, frivolous or vexatious (Rule… [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:26 am
We had hoped that this would have been reflected in Her Majesty’s most gracious speech ... [read post]
8 May 2013, 1:54 pm
He was thus delighted to receive from old Katfriend Chris de Mauny this link to the BBC's report on today's Queen's Speech, the formal statement of Her Majesty's government's legislative intentions in the forthcoming session of Parliament. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:45 am by Kelly Buchanan
  Her Majesty in Council may make laws and constitute courts as may appear to be necessary for the peace, order and good government of her subjects, as well as others living in the settlement. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm by legaleaseckut
Langevin said he is not a lawyer but a private citizen, he mentions, however, have a good experience in applications since the 2000s, indicating that these refer disputes between other four situations: a) the fact that he fell into a trap of misinformation, as a breeding boar he had; b) the fact that his brother [11] has sold his farm without administrator permission; c) the fact that people in authority, for the Queen had been “six false psychologist” on it and have… [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm by legaleaseckut
Langevin said he is not a lawyer but a private citizen, he mentions, however, have a good experience in applications since the 2000s, indicating that these refer disputes between other four situations: a) the fact that he fell into a trap of misinformation, as a breeding boar he had; b) the fact that his brother [11] has sold his farm without administrator permission; c) the fact that people in authority, for the Queen had been “six false psychologist” on it and have… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:46 am by Katherine Gundersen
As a result, and subject to the views of the Parliament, we are now proposing that there should be no absolute exemption for information relating to communications with senior members of the Royal Family.We remain firmly of the view that communications between Her Majesty and other members of the Royal Family with Scottish Ministers - and other public authorities - should be handled sensitively and confidentially, with strict and appropriate application of the exemptions… [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 8:00 am by emagraken
The plaintiff will certainly suffer prejudice if her application is dismissed. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:40 am by Randy Barnett
They may sometimes rise in quiet and stately majesty, and inundate the land, refreshing and fertilizing the earth with their mysterious properties. [read post]