Search for: "Application of Peter Andrews (3 Cases)"
Results 81 - 100
of 287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2022, 6:09 am
” (PI0814514-8) “The limitation of the alloy composition, described in independent claims 1 and 3 of this opinion, occurred from the compositions of table 1 of the specification of the present application. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Andrew Sharpe has since written an excellent blog post about the case and Twitter guidelines, discussing “the danger … that lawyers may consider the risks of going over the line are too great, and so withdraw from public debate; the so-called chilling effect“. [read post]
3 May 2023, 6:16 am
In this case that issue was made more complicated by the fact that the parties disputed which foreign law should be applied. [read post]
8 May 2010, 6:52 am
Andrew Dickinson: “Provisional Measures in the “Brussels I” Review – Disturbing the Status Quo? [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 6:38 am
The judge reviewed the national case law on selections/deletions from multiple lists (Merck v Shionogi [2016] EWHC 2989 (Pat), Nokia v IPCom [2012] EWCA Civ 567 and GlaxoSmithKline v Wyeth [2016] EWHC 1045 (Pat)) and the EPO cases reviewed therein and in the EPO Case Law Book. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 3:01 am
This brief review of the decided cases indicates that there are some general principles applicable in many if not all cases. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am
Having heard Mr Smith further, I suspended the search warrant ad interim, granted warrant for service of the bill and continued the matter to a date to be fixed.[2] The circumstances in which that application was made, as I understood them from what appeared in the bill, in two telephone attendance notes and the explanation provided by Mr Andrew Smith QC, who was accompanied and instructed by Mr Graeme Watson, Solicitor Advocate, a partner… [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 12:12 pm
In the case of centralized SPC applications, the EUIPO will issue a binding opinion at the end of the examination procedure. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Andrew Scott Harris, for Plaintiff-Appellee. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:40 am
http://bit.ly/PSrHXQ (Peter Vogel) When the Tortoise Beats the Hare: Insider Fraud! [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 11:40 am
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2022 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Practical Guide to Successful Intellectual Property Valuation and Transactions by Alexander Puutio€ 135 Internet Law: A Concise Guide to Regulation… [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 12:18 am
In this case, “specific” national law will remain applicable to these titles. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 12:18 am
In this case, “specific” national law will remain applicable to these titles. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
In the Courts On Friday 13 January 2012 the Administrative Court (Toulson LJ, Sweeney and Sharp JJ) heard a remarkable application in the case of R (on the application of Associated Newspapers) v Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
On 28 October 2015, there was an application in the case of Brand v Berki. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Peter Turner, __ F.3d _ (D.C. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:25 am
In SPC examination proceedings, the EUIPO will be supposed to issue an examination opinion within 6 months after the publication of the corresponding SPC application in normal cases. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
The Crown Office said the report is still “under consideration” nearly four years on from when Police Scotland first referring the case to the Lord Advocate.JUDGE, SUSPENDED:Statement from the Judicial Office for Scotland on the suspension of part-time sheriff Peter WatsonSheriff Peter Watson was suspended from the office of part-time sheriff on 16 February 2015, in terms of section 34 of the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 12:56 am
In line with this, the JURI Committee intends to specify that the EUIPO shall not only examine the compliance of an SPC application with all the “Article 3 conditions” but also with the condition requiring the consent of a third-party marketing authorization holder. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 11:22 am
The case is NRA v. [read post]
