Search for: "Armendariz v. Armendariz"
Results 81 - 100
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Rehearing granted and modified opinion issued in arbitration case: Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Corp.
2 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
” (Brown v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:30 pm
” (Armendariz v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:49 pm
For example, Concepcion could easily be read as completely overruling Armendariz v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 11:00 am
Haluck v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 12:10 pm
Also, the court did not find unconscionable the agreement's silence on discovery procedures and no requirement of a written award, holding these were "implied" in the agreement under Armendariz v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:25 pm
” (Armendariz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:30 am
Pulli v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 10:16 am
The agreement was written prior to a California Supreme Court case, Armendariz v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 3:05 pm
” The Governor specifically referenced the California Supreme Court’s protections afforded to employees pertaining to arbitration agreements as explained in Armendariz v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 3:42 pm
A few years before in Armendariz v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:23 am
INS, 267 F.3d 996 (9th Cir. 2001); Lujan-Armendariz v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 11:17 am
(See Armendariz, supra, 24 Cal.4th at p. 113.) [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 1:25 am
The California Supreme Court has a very informative and detailed discussion regarding the enforceability of arbitration agreements in Armendariz v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:08 am
The trial court further concluded that under Armendariz v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
In the case of Armendariz v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 12:13 pm
The district court dismissed the claim on the basis of Armendariz v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:29 pm
The plaintiff argues that the theory is “fully applicable” to state-law rights, citing Armendariz and Little v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 4:06 pm
In 2000, Armendariz v Foundation Health held that the employer had to pay it all. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 1:49 pm
Kaniakapupu v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 8:28 am
The court also found that the agreement complied with the protections of the California Supreme Court's decision in Armendariz v. [read post]
