Search for: "Armour v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2012, 6:32 am by Nabiha Syed
Briefly: Lyle Denniston of this blog previews this week’s oral argument in Armour v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
That issue can arise, as it does in the new case of Armour, et al., v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:41 am by Brian A. Comer
Armour & Co., 196 S.C. 1, 12 S.E.2d 34 (1940) (sickness after eating  ham with a "bluish-greenish cast"); Gantt v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 5:07 am
One such instance occurred recently when a cartoonist tried to sue the BBC for millions by claiming that CBeebies bosses copied his characters: Michael Mitchell v BBC [2011] EWPCC 42. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:58 am by Kiran Bhat
Kelly Phillips Erb of Forbes reports on the Court’s decision to grant cert. in Armour v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:14 am by Lyle Denniston
The case, Armour, et al., v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:45 am by Kali Borkoski
§ 401 et seq.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply Armour v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition (forthcoming) Petitioner’s reply (forthcoming)   Armour v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am by Kiran Bhat
Tuesday’s arguments in the GPS surveillance case United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 6:23 pm by Lara
  Not surprisingly, Under Armour also opposed Energy Armor’s trademark registration. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court will decide this fall whether to accept the appeal, Armour v. [read post]