Search for: "Arnold v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 595
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
The end result of that litigation was that both parties agreed there was a contract between them and that it was governed by the law of the state of Pennsylvania (where it had been litigated). [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:00 am by John Jascob
This list includes (among others) (i) publicly traded companies, (ii) 501(c) tax exempt entities under the Internal Revenue Code, (iii) certain pooled investment vehicles, (iv) any entity that (a) employs more than 20 employees on a full-time basis in the United States, (b) filed in the previous year's federal income tax returns more than $5,000,000 in gross receipts or sales in the aggregate (including the receipts or sales of other entities owned by the entity and other… [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Ghanaian man comes to the United States on an F-1 visa, which allows him to stay in the country as long as he's enrolled in an approved educational institution. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
In briefs in both cases last month, the outgoing acting solicitor general, Jeffrey Wall, urged the justices to grant cert and vacate the court of appeals’ decisions (both of which went against Trump) under United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Will a license agreement, designating “the countries of the European Union”, be considered to also cover the United Kingdom? [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:05 pm
As we head into a hot holiday weekend, here are some appellate items to explore:Today's DJ has Justice Moore's piece on Jackie Robinson, United States v. 2LT Jack R Robinson as well as Marc Alexander's book review: Notorious RBG Talks Life, Love, Liberty, and LawThe Recorder's On Appeals column has Katy Graham's The Far-Reaching Effects of a Landmark Decision on the Standard of Appellate Review for Clear and Convincing… [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
United States, 509 U.S. 544, 550, 113 S.Ct. 2766, 125 L.Ed.2d 441 (1993), quoting M. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
New York politicians are expected to vote to force the city’s police force to divulge the surveillance technology it uses, one of many reforms of law enforcement being considered across the United States. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:40 am by sydniemery
United States: CSLI, Third-Party Doctrine, and Privacy in the Twenty-first Century 14 Liberty U. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court held that Congress is required to reimburse health insurance companies for losses created by the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held 8-1 that Congress is required to reimburse health insurance companies for losses created by the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
Issuers Targeted in Securities Class Action Lawsuits Filed in the United States Posted by David H. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
United States The Atlantic had a piece “The True Danger of the Trump Campaign’s Defamation Lawsuits”. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 9:08 am
Contents include:Carolina Moehlecke, The Chilling Effect of International Investment Disputes: Limited Challenges to State Sovereignty Anastassia V Obydenkova & Vinícius G Rodrigues Vieira, The Limits of Collective Financial Statecraft: Regional Development Banks and Voting Alignment with the United States at the United Nations General Assembly Lauge N Skovgaard Poulsen, Beyond Credible Commitments: (Investment) Treaties as Focal Points … [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
United States The Hill reports that President Trump’s reelection campaign is suing CNN for defamation over articles about Russian efforts to assist the Presidents 2016 presidential bid. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm by Mark Walsh
” Alito says, in reference to a statute that President Barack Obama’s administration declined to defend in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
United States Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has covered the Department of Justice’s plans to restrict the encryption of communications data. [read post]