Search for: "Arthur Andersen LLP"
Results 81 - 100
of 180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2011, 9:33 am
A stunning example is 2009’s Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:02 pm
KPMG LLP, 922 N.E. 2d 898 (N.Y. 2010). [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 7:46 am
., Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:55 am
See Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
The possible charges against E&Y recall the specter of Arthur Andersen back in 2002. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:31 am
Goyal, CA-9, No. 08-10436, December 10, 2010).In a concurring opinion, Chief Judge Kozinski called the instant case one of a string of recent cases in which courts have found that federal prosecutors overreached by trying to stretch criminal law beyond its proper bounds, citing Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:05 am
Judge Kozinski cites a string of recent cases in which federal court’s have found that prosecutors have overreached: Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
See Arthur Andersen LLP v.United States, 544 U.S. 696, 705-08 (2005); United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
See Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:01 pm
See Arthur Andersen LLP v.United States, 544 U.S. 696, 705-08 (2005); United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
.); Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 1:41 pm
For instance, in Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:27 am
But as any former partner at Arthur Andersen LLP — once one of the "Big Five" accounting firms — could attest, an outside professional (and especially an auditor) whose corporate client experiences a rapid or disastrous decline in fortune precipitated by insider fraud does not skate away unscathed. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:27 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, closing a loophole that had been opened and expanded by the United States District Courts in California, which had allowed the enforcement of noncompetes in certain circumstances. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 12:19 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal.4th 937, 81 Cal.Rptr.3d 282, 189 P.3d 285, 292-93 (Cal.2008) (finding no waiver of statutory right to indemnity for claims resulting from the employees' acts within the scope of employment, even though release employee was asked to sign referred to waiver of “any and all” claims against employer). [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:47 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937, 946, 81 Cal.Rptr.3d 282, 189 P.3d 285 (Edwards)), we conclude that the employee has a viable Tameny claim. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:48 am
Further, a bankruptcy trustee stands in the shoes of the debtor and is able to maintain actions that the debtor could have brought prior to the bankruptcy proceedings (see generally Hirsch v Arthur Andersen & Co., 72 F3d 1085). [read post]
31 May 2010, 3:50 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 5:59 am
"Applying criminal penalties to white-collar crime by employees of corporations has never been very successful and can lead to disastrous results, such as in the case of Arthur Andersen LLP, which ultimately went out of business due to a criminal prosecution for destruction of evidence that cost "thousands of jobs". [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 12:27 pm
After Arthur Andersen LLP was convicted in 2002 of allegedly destroying evidence and went out of business, costing thousands of jobs, prosecutors tried other methods of punishment for big companies. [read post]
