Search for: "Arthur v. City of Los Angeles"
Results 81 - 100
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2015, 10:50 am
Code Regs., § 15126.4(a)(1)(B); Sacramento Old City Assn. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 11:51 am
(County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:28 am
Kersten makes the point that Darrow’s career changed after the Los Angeles debacle. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:40 am
By its long-awaited order issued October 31, 2014, the Court has now set argument in the matter for 9:00 a.m., December 2, 2014, in Los Angeles. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:59 am
City of Los Angeles (2004) 126 Cal.App.4th 1180, 1195.) [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm
’” (Citing Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:19 pm
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385, 1398.) [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 2:18 pm
City of Los Angeles (2nd Dist. 2014) __ Cal.App.4th ___, Case No. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 462-464, 475.) [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
City of Sunnyvale City Council (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 1351 and Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:06 pm
City of Los Angeles (3/18/13 2nd Dist., Div. 4), 2013 WL 1099017.) [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Los Angeles, 11-798, involves whether regulations implementing the Port of Los Angeles’s “Clean Trucks Program” are preempted by the Federal Aviation Administrative Authorization Act or, if you like living dangerously close to the edge of a Microsoft sticky-keys warning, the FAAAA. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
City of Los Angeles (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 259, 272 — for the first time at oral argument; the quoted language explained that requiring EIRs for ministerial actions would be a wasteful gesture where the agency did not possess enough discretion to deny or modify the project based on environmental concerns raised by the EIR. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
City of Los Angeles (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 259, 272 — for the first time at oral argument; the quoted language explained that requiring EIRs for ministerial actions would be a wasteful gesture where the agency did not possess enough discretion to deny or modify the project based on environmental concerns raised by the EIR. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455; South Orange County Wastewater Authority v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455; South Orange County Wastewater Authority v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:03 pm
City of Carmel - California lawyer Arthur Coon of Miller Starr Regalia on the firm's blog, CEQA Developments Fashion Law 101: Sensory Trademarks - Los Angeles lawyer Staci Riordan of Fox Rothschild on the firm's Fashion Law Blog What Does The Supreme Court's Ruling In US v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
From the days of Fenton and Conkling, and Arthur and Cornell, and Platt, from the days of David B. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:13 pm
Irell & Manella: Complaint [Superior Court of California - County of Los Angeles] Juliette Youngblood: Entertainment Lawyer of the Year [Century City Bar Association] Juliette Carolina Youngblood [Avvo] [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
