Search for: "Associated Merchandise Group, Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2011, 3:32 pm
” Davis’ heirs seek injunctive relief and the destruction of all of the "confusingly similar" Miles Café advertising and merchandise. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 11:47 am
, Coach Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:36 pm
Profiles, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 5:06 am
LHC Group, Inc., the court ruled that driving was clearly an essential function of the rank-and-file position but not necessarily the team leader position. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 9:23 am
Genentech, Inc. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP) Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46) Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v Unilever plc… [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
(IPKat) US Copyright – Decisions District Court S D New York: Merchandising of Shepard Fairey ‘Obama Hope’ image not fair use; factual issues remain on substantial similarity: Shepard Fairey et al v Associated Press (Copyrights & Campaigns) Do-over on the writing requirement: Vergara Hermosilla v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 9:31 am
Patton is an associate in Venable’s Advertising and Marketing Practice Group, representing clients in a broad range of industries on matters related to advertising, marketing, and intellectual property law. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc., 11-616, involving a First Amendment challenge to St. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm
Retailing & Consumer Servs. 86 (2014) ("An examination of product type did produce substantial difference as impulse buying was greater for fashion merchandise than supermarket purchases and general merchandise. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
Patent No. 5,784,584 owned by and Technology Properties Ltd. and Patriot Scientific Corporation, entitled HIGH PERFORMANCE MICROPROCESSOR USING INSTRUCTIONS THAT OPERATE WITHIN INSTRUCTION GROUPS. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:30 am
Take Ant Group Co. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:04 am
Services, Inc. v Jupiter Partners, L.P., 309 AD2d 288, 300 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
§ 1338 (2000), against Defendant, Sound Merchandising, Inc. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am
Local international dispute resolution firm GST LLP (“GST”) represented Plaintiff WF Worldwide Group Mexico Financiamiento y Colocación de Equipo (“WF Worldwide”) and obtained the 2.3 million dollar default judgment that was ultimately vacated. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:10 am
But scores of small community institutions are also listed, along with large and small processors with roots in the banking industry, including Fiserv Inc., FIS Inc., and Jack Henry & Associates. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 11:53 am
A group of five of these employees, including Mr. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:09 pm
F&G International Group Holdings, LLC, No. 20-cv-73 (S.D. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
-flagged vessels engaged in international and interstate commerce to use specified low-sulfur fuels while those ships are navigating outside of the State's three-mile seaward territorial boundary so established.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the Maritime Law Association of the United StatesAmicus brief of the World Shipping Council et al.Petitioner's reply Blackstone Group, L.P. v. [read post]