Search for: "Associates Discount Corp. v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
Hirschfield,[13] the court stated that: “While it is the established public policy of this State that medical providers may not engage in voluntary prospective fee-splitting arrangements, this blanket proscription against fee-splitting does not extend to a licensed professional associated with or employed by a professional corporation formed to provide medical services. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 2:18 am
The omission of a single letter from the mark such as an “s” in Tire Discounters, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:15 pm
’” (Quoting NXIVM Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Rather, it is the combination of a 1913 decision of the United States Supreme Court, Michigan Central R.R. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:06 pm
In this regard, it is reminiscent of the early Sherman Act decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 2:30 pm
Enablement is closely related to the requirement for utility.6 As we noted in Process Control Corp. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Chairman Schapiro further stated that the end of the program was designed “to expedite the Commission’s enforcement efforts and ensure that justice is swiftly served. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
” [17] The enforcement unit of the Fina [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:00 am
United States Dredging Corp., a judicial dissolution of a closely held corporation, where the court attempted to clarify the distinction between a 'marketability discount,' a discount applied in stock valuation to compensate for the lack of a ready market for the shares, and a 'minority discount,' a discount applied in stock valuation to compensate for the lack of control enjoyed by a minority shareholder. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 1:14 pm
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 278 Or. 305, 310-11; Baker v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
Don’t give up (International Law Office) Morocco Morocco hopes to benefit from Iranian technology expertise (Afro-IP) Netherlands Medical aid association Eers [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Sanders 718 Realty Broker 3 Malcolm Louis Adams Century 21 Milestone Realty Brokerage - Residential 3 ROBERT NAPOLITANO Capri Jet Realty Corp. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are often used… [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:39 am
" 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 1:14 am
United States [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Exxon Mobile Corp., et al. (07-276). [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 8:10 am
§ 808.1(d)).Then the court analyzes Buckman Co. v. [read post]
