Search for: "At & T COMMUNICATIONS v. Marks"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2009, 2:28 am
General Motors v Yplon) that pan-market fame isn't required. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
V. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:30 am
While San Francisco’s tiny African American community (less than 5000 people prior to the War) faced discrimination, it was not subject to the extreme race hatred and bigotry that marked relations between the white and Asian communities. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
In Kellogg Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:00 pm
Kremerman v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Haters: Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell and the Masquerade of Justice Karen Wink, U.S. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Haters: Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell and the Masquerade of Justice Karen Wink, U.S. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 2:33 am
The General Court, in a similar way, requires that a trade mark must be able to distinguish a product’s or service’s origin “directly and with certainty” (“de façon immediate et certaine”: Case T-234/01 – Stihl v OHIM). [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:07 am
I really do hope that the Court doesn’t edge back towards Ohio v. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 5:19 pm
They areCase T-133/05 Meric v OHIM, Arbora & Ausonia (PAM-PIM'S BABY-PROP), 7 September. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 7:28 am
Here are the rest of today's Community trade mark decisions from Luxembourg ...Case T-190/05 Sherwin-Williams v OHIM (TWIST & POUR). [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
YSL v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:51 am
He ran through the salient registration criteria of Community trade marks and designs and added that no mark would be refused on the basis that it was already registered as a design. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:08 pm
Sharing in the use of the Burning Man marks enables the community feel ownership over the brand and kinship with the brand owner. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 9:34 pm
According to Senior British trade mark practitioner Richard Abnett (Reddie & Grose), below right: "I don't understand why OHIM still adopts this view when they have more money than they know what to do with, so translation costs are not a problem. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:46 am
The Community Trade Mark Regulation and Harmonisation Directive, which each actually containing the "c" word, do not articulate a notion of a consumer protection function, and no rights or remedies are open to consumers who are unprotected. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:08 am
Cornette v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:11 am
" Primrose Retirement Communities, LLC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Wouldn’t it be easier to simply say that perhaps Yoshida’s trade marks were not that distinctive? [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:03 pm
In relation to descriptiveness the issue was whether the terms were descriptive of the retail services for which GO sought registration ( they weren't), while the descriptiveness issue was whether the public would recognise those marks as an indication of origin because they were inherently distinctive or had acquired distinctiveness through use (which they wouldn't). [read post]
