Search for: "Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The" Results 81 - 100 of 3,210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Gore Haunts the Supreme Court’s Colorado Case. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
During oral argument before the Colorado Supreme Court, Scott Gessler, Petitioner's counsel, cited the Washington gifts, saying "no one thought that [the Clause] applied to George Washington. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
If I had to bet, I'd say that SCOTUS will reverse the Colorado Supreme Court on some ground having to do with the limits on state court enforcement of Section 3, because that issue seemed to generate concern among the largest number of Justices.To say that Trump will win is not, of course, to say that he should win. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Private funding is now banned or limited in 27 states. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm by Steven Calabresi
 The Court will likely reverse the Colorado Supreme Court based on Griffin's Case, the absence of congressional legislation enforcing Section 3, and the prudential and pragmatic arguments made in Section 3 of the Brief signed by Attorneys General Edwin Meese III, Michael B. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
If Trump is removed from the ballot in Colorado, Roberts predicted that states would eventually attempt to knock other candidates off the ballot. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:55 am by Tom Joscelyn
As we ramp up to trial, the general public should also not be led astray by the discourse. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Professor Akhil Amar, On His Podcast, Responds to Attorney General Mukasey and the Tillman-Blackman Position (9/14/23). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 12:16 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
Fish and Wildlife Service must make decisions that protect precious native wildlife for generations to come, rather than allowing states to cater to trophy hunters, trappers and ranchers. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  Colorado isn’t even trying to prevent Colorado’s presidential electors from casting their electoral votes for Donald Trump if he wins the popular vote in Colorado in November, nor (as I’ve explained earlier) has it asserted any state law authority to exclude Trump from the Colorado general election ballot (something that Colorado law does not appear to authorize). [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
Similarly, the brief of former attorneys general Meese, Mukasey, and Barr, professors Calabresi and Lawson, and two organizations, argues that "[t]he big problem for those advocating for the Colorado decision is that President Trump has not been convicted of violating Section 2383," which they wrongly describe as part of "the Enforcement Act of 1870. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Trump himself made this Positions Clause argument before the Colorado Supreme Court, and he even prevailed on it in the Colorado district court. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
It was filed in early September 2023 by six Colorado residents eligible to vote in that state’s Republican primary. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am by Dean Falvy
One potential off-ramp would be to agree with Donald Trump’s attorneys that their client “is not even subject to section 3, as the President is not an ‘officer of the United States’ under the Constitution. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 8:00 am by Paul L. Singer
For now, revisit our conversations with Attorneys General in New Hampshire, Illinois, Colorado, Nebraska, Connecticut, and others here. [read post]
  The Act also grants the Attorney General the authority to require controllers to disclose data protection assessments relevant to investigations conducted by the Attorney General. [read post]