Search for: "Austin v. Housing Authority"
Results 81 - 100
of 324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2008, 2:26 pm
Austin, on appeal from the County Court, contended that Brent v Knightly predated the HRA and is not compliant with Art 1 Protocol 1 of the ECHR: Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:27 am
The motion, which was filed before the trial began, noted that the prosecution obtained evidence including computer equipment, electronic storage devices, and other evidence from a search of [Rad’s] house pursuant to a search warrant requested by FBI agent Suzanne Beck and Order signed by United States Magistrate Judge Andrew Austin February 24, 2009. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
-Austin Sept. 1, 2016, no pet. h.) [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
"It denigrates the staff, that's not helpful," she said of the creation of the subcommittee, adding that "it overreaches the authority of this committee. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:01 pm
”Some 35 years later, in Brown v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 1:11 pm
Reading "Bent on Intent: Finger-Pointing, Politics Permeate [Entergy v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm
He began by reminding the Court of its 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utilities District No. 1 v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Could President Obama be potentially charged with murder for allegedly authorizing drone strikes targeting U.S. citizens located abroad? [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:16 am
Sweatt v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:40 am
On at least one occasion, Leteff met Roberts and the acquaintance at Roberts's house for a loan of over half a million dollars. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:21 am
Austin, 60 Wash. 2d 227 (1962). [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am
Austin v UK and Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) It is in this context that the cases of Austin v UK and Von Hannover (No 2) are considered, in order to argue that certain of the proposals currently being put forward are echoed in dominant themes within the judgments. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:22 pm
The more substantive changes are these guidance on the length of grounds of appeal (UKSC PD3 para 3.1.2 and JCPC PD 3 para 3.1.2) and on chronologies in statements of facts and issues (UKSC PD 5 para 5.1.3 and JCPC PD 5 para 5.1.7); an express reference to the House of Lords’ Practice Statement of 26 July 1966 on judicial precedent and the passage in Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28 making it clear that the statement… [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
Finally, the House of Representatives passed the Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2012 yesterday, a response to the Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:28 pm
“We’ll buy a ski house next. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm
That dubious point was rebutted well enough at the hearings by EFF-Austin board member Matt Henry (see his column in the Houston Chronicle) who compared the situation to US v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:14 pm
” Last term, in Texas Department of Housing v. [read post]
