Search for: "B Hill" Results 81 - 100 of 3,249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am by Alex Phipps
Arriving at (4), the court explained that the trial court’s decision to admit evidence of defendant removing his electronic monitoring device fifteen days before the shooting under Rule of Evidence 404(b) was not error. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:30 am by Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
B&C and Acta are pleased to present “What to Expect in Chemicals Policy and Regulation and on Capitol Hill in 2024,” featuring Richard E. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:30 am by Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
B&C and Acta are pleased to present “What to Expect in Chemicals Policy and Regulation and on Capitol Hill in 2024,” featuring Richard E. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:07 am by Bob Ambrogi
New York Times writer Kashmir Hill is interviewed by Jeff Ward about Hill’s book on facial recognition technology. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:56 am by Beatrice Yahia
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
(b) Regulatory competition We avoid well-worn debates surrounding U.S. interstate competition for corporate charters and instead present evidence in the UK of the strong influence of regulatory competition on public rulemaking in the context of the 2021 Lord Hill listing rules review and recently enacted Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (FSMA 2023). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:22 am by The White Law Group
(CRD#:39262), Woodland Hills, CA,  B, 07/10/2019 – 12/23/2019, SPARTAN CAPITAL SECURITIES, LLC (CRD#:146251), NEW YORK, NY B, 08/21/2017 – 07/10/2019, WESTERN INTERNATIONAL SECURITIES, INC. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
The defendant’s earliest registrations were registered from May 2016, though the claim appeared to have kicked off in 2021 (although I could not identify exactly when from the judgment).The judge devoted a good 20-something paragraphs to this issue, eventually concluding that the relevant date was 26 July 2019, because this was the earliest date – on the facts – by which the claimant knew of both: (a) the defendant’s use of its 2015 mark; and (b) the existence of the… [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 2:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
Hill (1967) … false light invasion of privacy claims incorporate the same First Amendment protections as claims for defamation under state law. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 2:58 am by Patricia Salkin
The court considered the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for intervention as of right under Rule 24(a) and permissive intervention under Rule 24(b). [read post]