Search for: "B. D.C. B." Results 81 - 100 of 4,233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 11:57 am by Lauren Lynch Flick
  The Form 395-A is similar to the Form 395-B, but applies to MVPDs rather than broadcasters. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am by Eugene Volokh
[The decision allows such pseudonymity when the defendant has already been found (by default judgment) to have committed the assault, but Judge Wilkinson's concurrence argues that, absent this unusual factor, one-sided pseudonymity should be frowned on.] [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Sarah Friedman
She was heavily involved with the women’s suffrage movement in the 1870s, working with Susan B. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by beng
In total, 38 states and Washington, D.C. have legalized sports gambling in one form or another, according to Legal Sports Report , and “nearly every U.S. state legislature has at least introduced a sports betting bill at some point since 2018, with more expected to revisit or introduce new legislation in 2024. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Josh Blackman
Why does –you know, if you weren't from Colorado and you were from Wisconsin or you were from Michigan and it really –you know, what the Michigan secretary of state did is going to make the difference between, you know, whether Candidate A is elected or Candidate B is elected, I mean, that seems quite extraordinary, doesn't it? [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:17 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
According to documents Nexstar obtained, Texas has paid $124,603,616.19 to bus more than 100,000 migrants from the state’s border communities to Washington D.C., New York City, Chicago, Philadelphia, Denver and Los Angeles as of Jan. 10. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm by Mark Burridge
District Court for the Southern District of New York by Lyndon B. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
”[11] Nonetheless, as challenges to the bump stock ban have percolated through the courts of appeals, litigants have repeatedly raised the argument that the rule of lenity prohibits courts from deferring to an agency’s interpretation of a criminal statute.[12] In advocating for the application of the rule of lenity, the respondent in Cargill invokes the two main justifications for the rule: notice and separation of powers concerns.[13] Noting that the ATF had… [read post]