Search for: "B. L.1"
Results 81 - 100
of 10,787
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
A public official’s social media activity constituted state action under §1983 only if the official both (1) possessed actual authority to speak on the state’s behalf, and (2) purported to exercise that authority when speaking on social media. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 7:06 pm
§ 156(d)(1) does not apply here because the approval was transmitted on a business day (a Friday) before 4:30 pm Eastern Time. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 8:48 am
Marlene Gebauer 1:17 So I mean, tell us a little bit about sort of the reasoning behind the report and how it’s how it’s evolved. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:59 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am
L. 11-261 § 404(b)(1), as amended. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:26 am
Brannock and Sarah B. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Reg. 22558 (Apr. 1, 2024) . [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Section 1 requires all applicants to be depository institutions that are legally eligible to have master accounts. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:39 am
Appeals may be taken by 1) the juvenile, 2) the juvenile’s parent, guardian, or custodian, 3) a county, or 4) the State. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 10:55 am
Goal 3: Healthy Lives and WellbeingIn Chapter 5, Jorge L. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 12:42 pm
L. 975 (2018). [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:15 am
Y, por otro lado, (iv) determinar si los actos administrativos que ponen fin a un proceso selectivo declarando derechos en favor de los interesados, dictados en sustitución y desarrollo de otros previos anulados judicialmente y que determinaron la exclusión de aspirantes de aquél, comportan eficacia retroactiva a los efectos del artículo 39.3 de la Ley 39/2015, de 1 de octubre, del Procedimiento Administrativo Común de las Administraciones… [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 12:35 am
Die Amtsdauer beträgt sechs Jahre und beginnt am 1. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:57 am
The Staff also discussed the investment adviser sweep related to the SEC’s amended Marketing Rule (Rule 206(4)-1 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940).[2] Director Shah emphasized the timing of the sweep, occurring one year after the Rule’s compliance date, and the hope that this would prompt other investment advisers to review their policies and procedures and come within compliance of the new rule. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Amnesty Int'l, USA, derided as "self-inflicted injuries. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The MPPAA states that “[a]ny dispute between an employer and the plan sponsor of a multiemployer plan concerning a determination made under sections 1381 through 1399 of this title shall be resolved through arbitration,”[12] but § 502(b) of the Bankruptcy Code states that when an objection is filed to a proof of claim, the “court … shall determine the amount of such claim in lawful currency of the United States as of the date of the filing of the… [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:56 pm
However, IP as an asset class has several statutory cost recovery possibilities (§§ 162, 167, 174, 197, etc.)[1] Like many areas of federal income tax, the rules are full of exceptions and exceptions to exceptions. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
For L&E-specific podcasts, see: The Metaverse and L&E Podcast (Tim Taylor) Recent Supreme Court Rulings Impacting Labor & Employment Podcast (Tim Taylor) The Court Closes with LGBTQ Rights and Biden Debt Plan Podcast (Law 360) The Supreme Court Guts Affirmative Action Podcast (Law 360) Want the Sabbath Off? [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
