Search for: "B. Plumber" Results 81 - 100 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2018, 2:46 pm by franchiselawadmin
Moreover, a plumber that has its own business that eventually purchases a plumbing franchise may not be permitted to work in the plumbing industry for two years after expiration or termination, even if they had been independent for twenty years prior to becoming a plumbing franchisee. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 7:41 am by Ruth Levush
 The new regulation, which entered into effect on January 12, 2013, was introduced by the Ministry of Development, Competitiveness and Infrastructure and serves a twofold purpose: (a) to ensure that restaurant, shop and other business owners, as well as those who provide services, such as doctors, electricians, plumbers, hair dressers and others provide receipts; and (b) to make customers aware of their legal right to request a receipt for goods purchased or services… [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 8:28 am by David J. Freeman and Jordan M. Asch
ESD’s initial guidance, published March 24, 2020, listed “construction” as a category of “essential business,” “including skilled trades such as electricians and plumber,” and “for essential infrastructure or for emergency repairs and safety purposes. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:24 am by Jo Ann Hoffman & Associates, P.A.
As an example, the sewer is backed up on a construction site, a plumbing company is called to remedy the problem and the plumber gets injured when he falls in a hole the electrician left uncovered, then he can sue. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 2:40 am
The Journal News (Westchester County, New York),  June 24, 2009 Wednesday,  NEWS; Pg. 3,  340 words,  Suffern plumber charged in botched job,  Jenna Carlesso ... [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:17 am by Wally Zimolong
”  Therefore, for the statutory exception to apply there must be two things (a) the counter party to the agreement must be a “construction industry employer” and (b) the restriction must be limited to the site of the work. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:17 am by Wally Zimolong
”  Therefore, for the statutory exception to apply there must be two things (a) the counter party to the agreement must be a “construction industry employer” and (b) the restriction must be limited to the site of the work. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:58 am by Scott Wolfe Jr
So, for example, there would be an Alex Rodriquez on the project, and then a list of two or three other laborers like B. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 3:46 am
Appx. 532 (8th Cir. 2006) (per curiam) (unpublished) where inspections could be done by licensed plumbers as an alternative) [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The plaintiff, Plumbers Union Local No. 12 Pension Fund, argued that Morrison did not preclude their claims, even though the transaction on which they had acquired their shares had taken place on a London-based subsidiary of the Swiss stock exchange. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 3:03 pm
.) *** Detroit Newspaper Agency, d/b/a Detroit Newspapers (7-CA-42544; 350 NLRB No. 38) Detroit, MI July 27, 2007. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 8:18 am by Giles Peaker
Mr and Mrs Grose wrote that they had offered Mr Owens to have a power shower fitted “but he said he would get a plumber who worked for his company Owens and Porters to come and fit a shower on the company account”. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm by Timothy Kim
The Court, however, conceded that the “suffer or permit to work” standard is a “term of art” that cannot be interpreted literally because it would obviously encompass workers who are traditional independent contractors (e.g. plumbers) and would more or less eviscerate the commonly understood distinction between employees and independent contractors. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm by Timothy Kim
The Court, however, conceded that the “suffer or permit to work” standard is a “term of art” that cannot be interpreted literally because it would obviously encompass workers who are traditional independent contractors (e.g. plumbers) and would more or less eviscerate the commonly understood distinction between employees and independent contractors. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:02 pm by Timothy Kim
The Court, however, conceded that the “suffer or permit to work” standard is a “term of art” that cannot be interpreted literally because it would obviously encompass workers who are traditional independent contractors (e.g. plumbers) and would more or less eviscerate the commonly understood distinction between employees and independent contractors. [read post]