Search for: "B. ROBERTS" Results 81 - 100 of 9,122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2024, 10:04 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Chih-Ming Liang, Robert B Leflar, and Chih-Cheng Wu (Taipei Medical University, National Taiwan University and National Taiwan University - National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH)) have posted Taiwan's Medical Injury Law in Action (Emory International Law Review, Vol. 38, No. 1,... [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:14 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
United States —in which a 5-3 majority (including Chief Justice Roberts) sided largely with the federal government in blocking a less-aggressive effort by Arizona to create state-level immigration crimes. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 11:07 am by Paul Cassell
  As recounted in that post, the case arose from brutal murders committed by Robert Wharton and his accomplice. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:14 am by The White Law Group
Jay Pocius Allegedly Misappropriated Client Funds  According to a letter of acceptance, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has barred former Wells Fargo broker Jay Pocius (Jayson Robert Pocius) (CRD#: 6018543) from associating with any FINRA member at any time. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 4:39 am by jonathanturley
As shown in Exhibit 3, the government proposed changes to Paragraphs 14, 15 and 17 of the Diversion Agreement, and Paragraph 5(b) of the Plea Agreement. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am by Derek T. Muller
Anderson is a per curiam decision, which means we do not know the author, and, although I shouldn't speculate, it reads in some respects like the voice of Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am by Derek T. Muller
Anderson is a per curiam decision, which means we do not know the author, and, although I shouldn't speculate, it reads in some respects like the voice of Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am by David Pocklington
The DAC recommended all of the works to Etherington Ch. and did not feel that any part of the work was likely to affect (a) the character of the church as a building of special architectural or historic interest (b) the archaeological importance of the church or (c) the archaeological remains existing within the church or its curtilage, and did not recommend consultation [2]. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
 Pix credit here The majority’s choice of a different path leaves the remaining Justices with a choice of how to respond. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]