Search for: "BB v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2009, 7:56 am
Supreme Court declined to hear the reverse payment case Arkansas Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund, Paper, A.F. of L., et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am by Laura Sandwell
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am by Laura Sandwell
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
12 May 2017, 6:52 am by Andrew Abramowitz
As part of my extensive research for this blog post, I looked up the text of the AHCA, scrolled down to a random part of it, landing on this paragraph: (I) The ratio described in subclause (II) of clause (v) that would be determined for such State by substituting ‘2015’ for each reference in such subclause to ‘the third preceding year’ and by substituting ‘all such States’ for the reference in item (bb) of such subclause to… [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 6:53 am by Dan Frith
Justin Shaffer, et al. and BB&T Insurance Services v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:41 am
Defendant also took Justin and his friends to the desert to shoot BB guns. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
He did so by stating in cross-examining that the combination of BB Formula and Lactaway (another supplement that had been referred to) was “a dangerous cocktail, almost as bad as cyanide”. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 7:21 pm by FDABlog HPM
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in Teva Pharms USA, Inc. v. [read post]