Search for: "BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD V US"
Results 81 - 100
of 112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
SHAK v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:14 am
Vt. 2007).24 See Id. at 353. 25 See New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:53 am
On appeal, the Sixth Circuit first noted that as adopted in Dana Corp v Blue Cross & Blue Shield Mutual of Northern Ohio, disqualification of counsel is appropriate if “(1) a past attorney-client relationship existed between the party seeking disqualification and the attorney it seeks to disqualify; (2) the subject matter of those relationships was/is substantially related; and (3) the attorney acquired confidential information from the… [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of N.J., 663 F.3d 1124, 1135 (10th Cir. 2011). [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:16 pm
The following Florida companies have all of the above benefits, according to the Human Rights Campaign’s annual Corporate Equality Index: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida - Jacksonville Burger King – Miami Carlton Fields - Tampa CSX - Jacksonville Darden Restaurants – Orlando Greenburg Taurig - Miami Holland & Knight - Tampa Office Depot – Boca Raton Raymond James Financial – St. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:13 am
State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:03 am
(quoting Holy Cross Church of God in Christ v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm
Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin, 112 F.3d 869, 872 (7th Cir. 1997) ("Should 'John Doe' 's … records contain material that would be highly embarrassing to the average person yet somehow pertinent to this suit and so an appropriate part of the judicial record, the judge could require that this material be placed under seal. [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:28 am
The four insurers in the consolidated case were Maine Community Health Options, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company, and Mode Health Plan, Inc. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
Even assuming that this or that physician might have first been induced to try an off-label use because of supposedly “fraudulent” promotion, nobody’s going to keep using a drug, “apparently” for years, for that use if doesn’t work. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
To give one example, consider Doe v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am
Between 1999 and 2008, the defendants billed Blue Cross alone more than $18 million. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am
Between 1999 and 2008, the defendants billed Blue Cross alone more than $18 million. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLPDocket: 10-1339Issue(s): Whether under the implied preemption principles in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of N.J., 663 F.3d 1124, 1135 (10th Cir. 2011). [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am
Under these circumstances, the unfairness and prejudice caused to Defendants, as well as the public's interest in knowing who is using the courts to seek justice for an alleged wrong, outweigh the Plaintiff's interest against public disclosure of her identity. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
What's more, "the United States Supreme Court has barred any use of the sixth factor and advised that the second factor generally cannot be used as a ground for enhancing the award. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
’s Cross-Mot. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 12:12 pm
Pricing: Both pay-per-use and monthly subscription. [read post]
