Search for: "BRAND v DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE" Results 81 - 100 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
: TTAB says STEAM N’ MASH merely descriptive of process potatoes: In re ProMark Brands Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
In the marketing department, resources were directed from selling books to grandiose corporate branding schemes. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
On one hand, a declining number of smokers is a positive development for public health, but on the other, cigarette tax has been a major revenue tool for many states. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
4 May 2007, 6:05 pm
  Sears also argued that it would lose $16 million in business because customers would not substitute an alternate brand but instead shop elsewhere for the Dior and Givenchy products. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 10:48 pm by GJEL
USDA racial discrimination $2.3 billion In 2010, the US Department of Justice and the US Department of Agriculture announced a settlement over claims of racial discrimination in [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
Roy Greenslade in the Guardian looks at how all newspaper publishers, big and small, are facing the same problem of declining newsprint advertising revenue. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 7:31 am by Michael Geist
The French version defines news content as “Contenu – quel qu’en soit le support, notamment audio ou audiovisuel – qui rend compte de tout enjeu ou événement actuel d’intérêt public, l’explique ou fait suite à une enquête sur un tel enjeu ou événement. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
By Rebecca Tushnet and Eric GoldmanTrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. [read post]