Search for: "BRIGGS v. STATE"
Results 81 - 100
of 367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2020, 9:00 am
Briggs and Chicago v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
When the Supreme Court entertains argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 12:15 pm
Briggs & Stratton Power Prods. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 10:45 pm
["The Massacre That Emboldened White Supremacists"] William Briggs and Jon Krakauer wrote a sobering Op-Ed about the tragedy that gave rise to U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:22 pm
Briggs (consolidated with United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:56 am
It discusses, among other matters, the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Castillo v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
He says that it was not correct of Mr Harris QC to say that much of the evidence has already been gathered to support their methodology. 1235: Mr Hoskins QC says Mr Harris QC’s proposed methodology does not reveal what is practicable at certification stage. 1232: Lord Briggs asks if ‘preferability’ is different to ‘commonality’ in the Canadian legislation. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am
Mr Hoskins QC states that it does. 14:37: Lord Briggs questions whether there may be cases where equality is equity and that equality of distribution is fair. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:42 am
If you have any questions concerning the Briggs v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:42 am
If you have any questions concerning the Briggs v. [read post]
Argument preview: Determining the statute of limitations for military rape — and possibly a lot more
16 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm
” When the Supreme Court entertains argument in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
United States The Atlantic had a piece “The True Danger of the Trump Campaign’s Defamation Lawsuits”. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:43 pm
The Supreme Court will hear the libel appeal in Serafin v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm
There is a helpful passage at [89] ff: Recognition is a distinct and necessarily prior step to enforcement, but recognition and enforcement are closely linked: Briggs A, The Conflict of Laws (3rd ed, Oxford University Press, Clarendon Series, 2013) 140-141; Clarke v Fennoscandia Ltd [2007] UKHL 56; 2008 SC (HL) 122 at [18]-[23]. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm
There is a helpful passage at [89] ff: Recognition is a distinct and necessarily prior step to enforcement, but recognition and enforcement are closely linked: Briggs A, The Conflict of Laws (3rd ed, Oxford University Press, Clarendon Series, 2013) 140-141; Clarke v Fennoscandia Ltd [2007] UKHL 56; 2008 SC (HL) 122 at [18]-[23]. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm
There is a helpful passage at [89] ff: Recognition is a distinct and necessarily prior step to enforcement, but recognition and enforcement are closely linked: Briggs A, The Conflict of Laws (3rd ed, Oxford University Press, Clarendon Series, 2013) 140-141; Clarke v Fennoscandia Ltd [2007] UKHL 56; 2008 SC (HL) 122 at [18]-[23]. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 9:49 am
Briggs and United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 5:05 am
Co-authors Paul Yale and Rusty Tucker The concurrence and dissent in Briggs et al v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:30 am
Lord Briggs gave the main judgment. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:14 am
This decision is only the second application by a state supreme court of the rule of capture to hydraulic fracturing (from Texas, Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
