Search for: "Baker v. CIVIL SERV. COMMISSION" Results 81 - 100 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2017, 5:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
These civil rights protections serve the societal purpose of eradicating barriers to the equal treatment of all citizens in the commercial marketplace. 2. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
In addition, CSR has become a lever for civil society organizations to influence corporate practice and public policy.Advocates have seen CSR as a means of addressing governance gaps where government is weak. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
  Because unpermitted discharges can result in steep civil and criminal penalties, the meaning of WOTUS is of central importance. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am by Kate Howard
Issue: Whether the filing of a putative class action serves, under American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
We have no way of knowing what’s in those papers, held at the College of William & Mary (where he served as chancellor and of which he was very fond) and closed until 2026. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
Edgar Hoover during the Warren Commission’s investigation into the assassination of President Kennedy. [read post]
In the Supreme Court, I’ll take Kennedy (Kennedy v The Charities Commission [2014] UKSC 20) for several reasons. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
The new year took an early turn for the worse with our reigning relist heavyweight, Kalamazoo County Road Commission v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Take a swig of some good strong coffee because we’ve got a baker’s dozen first-time relists to get through before you pass out/return to your regularly scheduled programming. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 6:55 am by Tara Hofbauer
Stewart Baker brought us this week’s Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast, which featured a fascinating conversation with David Medine, Chairman of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB). [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
” Following the Supreme Court’s Burwell v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
If media reports are to be believed, this Ordinance also affects the opportunities of all senior level serving bureaucrats who were in the reckoning for the top bureaucrat’s job in the Prime Minister’s Office. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Then the government has to prove that the law serves a compelling interest. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:25 am by Dan Gauss
Earlier today, the ACLU and the ACLU of Vermont announced a fantastic settlement that we obtained in Baker & Linsley v. [read post]