Search for: "Ball v. State of New York"
Results 81 - 100
of 486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2016, 1:09 pm
A motion to dismiss has been filed in a California case filed by a New York woman who claims that the National Basketball Association’s Golden State Warriors violated the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (the “Wiretap Act”), 18 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
Until last week’s decision by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department — the same court that gave us 1545 Ocean Avenue — in Mace v Tunick, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 [2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017], I would have answered that question “no” with support from a number of case precedents in New York and other jurisdictions including that hotbed of contractarian jurisprudence known as Delaware. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
Until last week’s decision by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department — the same court that gave us 1545 Ocean Avenue — in Mace v Tunick, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 [2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017], I would have answered that question “no” with support from a number of case precedents in New York and other jurisdictions including that hotbed of contractarian jurisprudence known as Delaware. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:39 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run March 15, 2009. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:16 pm
See, e.g., New York v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 10:24 am
The Court of Appeals says the defendant may have a point.The case is Pierotti v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:21 am
Ball State Univ., 570 U.S. 421 (2013). [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 2:02 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run March 22, 2009. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 5:55 am
Co. of New York, 222 So. 2d 206, 209 (Fla. 1969)). [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 7:30 am
Pereira v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 12:47 pm
After the Supreme Court agreed to decide the challenge, the city lifted the restrictions by amending the ordinance and the state enacted a law reinforcing the city's new approach. [read post]
27 May 2010, 9:43 am
Generally, a party seeking to pierce the corporate veil must show: (1) complete domination and control of the subsidiary by the parent with respect to the transaction at issue; and (2) that such domination was used to commit a fraud or wrong against the plaintiff that resulted in the plaintiff's injury (see Matter of Morris v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin. , 82 NY2d 135, 141 [1993]; Do Gooder Prods., Inc. v American Jewish Theatre, Inc.,… [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 10:41 am
Plaintiff Dana Cheng is a New York resident. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 11:31 am
As Judge Richard Owen, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, once aptly reminded the author of this opinion while he was acting as counsel for a party at trial: "Once the cat is out of the bag, the ball game is over. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:03 am
On November 20, 2009, New York Yankees Partnership (an Ohio(?!?) [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:12 am
Employers should not take their eye off this ball. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:05 am
” In another post at The NCSL Blog, Soronen writes that another new grant, Espinoza v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:24 pm
As reflected here, notwithstanding concurrent state court jurisdiction in the ’33 Act, the Luther v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:23 pm
Over the weekend, the New York Times published a story on conservative legal challenges to greenhouse gas regulations and other environmental regulations, pinned to West Virginia v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 10:01 am
New York City Transit Authority (1st Dept. 2013). [read post]
