Search for: "Banks v. Merit Systems Protection Board"
Results 81 - 100
of 136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
The appellate court concluded that the bank’s exculpatory bylaw provision protected the directors. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:57 am
Leon informed the plaintiffs in Klayman v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm
Elizabeth’s Medical Center (SEMC) includes a clear message to health plans, health care providers, health care clearinghouses (Covered Entities) and their business associates to adequately secure and ensure that workforce members properly use internet applications and other systems used to share, access or maintain personally identifiable health information considered protected health information (PHI) in accordance with HIPAA. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Gulda, 331 Mass. 68 , 70 (1954); Merchants Nat’l Bank v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Gulda, 331 Mass. 68 , 70 (1954); Merchants Nat’l Bank v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:07 pm
While some may believe the idea of a lawsuit is unhelpful – the claims are not frivolous or without merit, instead they raise important questions for the courts and society to address.1. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
Yeager v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am
It held that the defendant could not be responsible for the content of the bulletin board it ran as content was posted. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
CLS Bank International Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Salmon Protection & Watershed Network v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:38 pm
Merit Systems Protection Board’s review of claims, and the level of detail required for False Claims Act complaints. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
Among the many questions that have arisen in the FDIC’s failed bank cases as individual defendants have tried to rely on the protection of the business judgment rule is whether or not the defense protects officers as well as directors (about which refer here) or whether it affords less protection to the directors and officers of banks than it does to corporate officials at other kinds of companies (about which refer here). [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
Among the many questions that have arisen in the FDIC’s failed bank cases as individual defendants have tried to rely on the protection of the business judgment rule is whether or not the defense protects officers as well as directors (about which refer here) or whether it affords less protection to the directors and officers of banks than it does to corporate officials at other kinds of companies (about which refer here). [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Banks often use a $50 across-the-board cap for both credit cards and debit cards (e.g., Visa and Master Card) and have parallel policies for both. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 3:41 am
Nor is the Enlarged Board aware of any divergence in this case law, suggesting that the Boards are in general quite comfortable with it. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
“If I am representing banks do I really care about .shoes? [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
See Friese v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:11 pm
Can you give us your take on this and does litigation to protect intellectual property rights stifle innovation? [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:31 am
While the cases are across the board in how they get there, one thing is for sure. [read post]
