Search for: "Banks v. Sullivan*" Results 81 - 100 of 379
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2020, 4:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, in view of the general rule that a lender, absent a special relationship with a borrower, does not owe a duty to verify the identity of an imposter who obtains a loan in a plaintiff’s name (see Landino v Bank of Am., 52 AD3d 571, 574-575 [2d Dept 2008]; Beckford v Northeastern Mtge. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
For example, a plaintiff whose bank statements were sent in error to his ex-wife failed in an action against his bank, as he did not establish any actual damage (Beauchamps blogpost). [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To avoid dismissal of the complaint as abandoned under such circumstances. a plaintiff must offer a reasonable excuse for the delay in moving for leave to enter a default judgment and demonstrate that the complaint is meritorious (Kay Waterproofing Corp. v Ray Realty Fulton Inc., 23 AD3d 624, 804 NYS2d 815 [1st Dept 2005]: HSBC Bank USA, Nat. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  This event is closed to the public.Student Presenters:Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu) The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (lauren.feldman@jhu.edu) Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York's Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu) Banking, Law, and American Liberalism: The Rise… [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
., on Friday, July 5, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Controlling shareholders, Dual-class stock, ESG, Institutional Investors, Lyft, Shareholder voting, Uber Director Independence and Oversight Obligation in Marchand v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am by Russell Spivak, Benjamin Wittes
Code, entitled “Assistance to foreign and international tribunals and to litigants before such tribunals,” is, in Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s words in Intel v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 12:09 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
“Pursuant to CPLR 4111 (c), when the answers on a verdict sheet ‘are inconsistent with each other and one or more is inconsistent with the general verdict, the court shall require the jury to further consider its answers and verdict or it shall order a new trial,’” wrote the panel, quoting Marine Midland Bank v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 11:43 am by M@jux-@dmin
Aunque Citi Bike está patrocinada por Citi Banks y es parte de un contrato con la Ciudad, usted probablemente no tenga un caso en contra de cualquiera de esas partes. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am by Sarah Grant
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in Force v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
At Fox News, Caleb Parke reports that the court’s decision in The American Legion v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
There is a post about this on the David Banks Media Law blog. [read post]