Search for: "Banning Company v. California" Results 81 - 100 of 1,155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm by Michael S. Knoll
Could California also ban pork from companies, Justice Amy Coney Barrett asked, that do not require all employees to be vaccinated, fund gender-affirming surgery, or provide certain forms of health care? [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 9:52 am by Jon L. Gelman
This case provides a judicial finding that establishes a causal relationship and as an evidentiary model in presenting scientific evidence to achieve that result.Pilliod v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:05 am by Florian Mueller
The announcement also mentioned a companion complaint filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in San Diego (this post continues below the document): 17-07-06 Qualcomm v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 7:12 am by Erik W. Weibust
And there is no express carveout for noncompetes entered into in connection with the sale of a business, which even California law and the FTC’s proposed noncompete ban include. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 6:22 am by Ken White
Alabama, the "company town" case Manhattan Community Access v. [read post]
Currently, non-compete contracts are regulated by state law: three states (California, North Dakota, and Oklahoma, as well as the District of Columbia) outright ban their enforcement, aside from a few narrow exceptions. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm by admin
And here Justice Scalia’s words, citing U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:46 am by Eric Goldman
Aliign “is an event, lifestyle, and apparel company” allegedly with a first trademark use in 2011. [read post]