Search for: "Barclay v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Mississippi; (2) whether the Florida Supreme Court’s per se harmless-error rule for Hurst violations contravenes the Supreme Court’s decisions holding that harmless-error review cannot be “automatic and mechanical,” Barclay v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:54 am by Marie Louise
Eircom (TorrentFreak) Ireland set to force ISPs to disconnect pirates (TorrentFreak) Malaysia Malaysia, ISPs, pirate content and the power of the hacking community (IP Komodo) New Zealand Proposed NZ software patent ban goes mainstream (Patentology) Sweden Torrent site throws in the towel fearing arrests (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom Round two of the English leg of the international patent battle before EWHC (Pat): Summary judgment and costs: come back and argue, says judge: Nokia… [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:22 pm
Because a copyright infringement claim would not provide the banks with complete relief, which was to put Fly out of business, the banks also included in their Federal case a claim under the State common law tort of "hot-news" misappropriation, otherwise stated as reaping the benefits of what one has not sown (in the words of an earlier United States Supreme Court Decision). [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
United States CNN reports that Stormy Daniels has reached a settlement with Michael Cohen and Keith Davidson, her former attorney, in her lawsuit that accused both men of working together to protect President Donald Trump. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Switzerland Swiss local reports that the Swiss Federal Court has held that clicking “like” on Facebook on hateful content could amount to a crime United States The US has recently tightened regulations over Chinese state media. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-402, and (apparently) Jordan v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am by Matrix Law
On Wednesday 12th July the Court will hand-down two judgments: Philipp v Barclays Bank UK PLC [2023] UKSC 25. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:43 pm by Marta Requejo
Barclays, Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale (2014), 1095). [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
United States Donald Trump’s lawyers have been arguing before New York’s highest court that the president is immune from a defamation lawsuit brought by former “Apprentice” contestant Summer Zervos. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
(as he then was) cautioned in IBCOS Computers Limited v Barclays Mercantile Highland Finance Limited [1994] FSR 275 that while merely taking a sufficiently general idea does not infringe, to take a detailed “idea” may do so. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Source: New York State Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), January 15, 2007 For your information we are posting the entire New York Legislature 2007 Chapter Law List as retrieved from the New York Legislative Retrieval System on January 15, 2008. [read post]
31 May 2010, 3:11 am
Microsoft Corp (Orange Book Blog) Second Circuit stays hot news injunction: Barclays v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 4:10 am
(Ars Technica) How to thrive among pirates – a look at film industry in China, Nigeria and India (The Technium)   Canada Government plans national digital economy consultation (Michael Geist) Transcript Canadian Heritage Committee hearing on new media posted (Michael Geist) RCMP arrests man for modifying game console (Michael Geist)   Europe The truth about ACTA – Michael Geist’s speech at European Parliament hearing on ACTA (Michael Geist)   India Arguments against… [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:59 pm by Duncan
: Don Henley et al v Charles DeVore etc al (IP Whiteboard) TheFlyOnTheWall.com – Google and Twitter pour cold water on ‘hot news’: Barclays v TheFlyOnTheWall.com (Ars Technica) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) US Copyright Group – P2P lawyers tell judge: suing 5,000 ‘Does’ at once is fine (ArsTechnica) US Trademarks & Domain Names Online keyword advertising: Misleading customers? [read post]