Search for: "Barnes v. Stephens" Results 81 - 100 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
Stephen Vladeck and Julian Ku discuss the case in a Bloomberg Law podcast. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As with an award of an attorney's fee made pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 237 (b), the court will base its decision primarily upon both parties' ability to pay, the nature and extent of the services required to deal with the support dispute, and the reasonableness of their performance under the circumstances as was held in McCann v Guterl and Matter of Barnes v Barnes. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 5:41 am by James Romoser
At Subscript Law, Mariam Morshedi has a new infographic report explaining Carney v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
 In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes focuses on the Court’s 1972 order in Baker v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Consonant with the foregoing, it is the opinion of this Court that the City has failed to establish a right to governmental immunity in the instant matter (see Sean M. v City of New York, 20 AD3d at 160; Barnes v County of Nassau, 108 AD2d at 55). [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 2:18 pm
Finally, in the spring issue of the City Journal, Stephen B. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
The first is McWilliams v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Jay Willis
 Robert Barnes at the Washington Post, David Savage and Ben Fritz at the L.A. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:32 am
McGhee and Wood v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:28 am by Rachel Sachs
Royal Dutch Petroleum continues, with posts by Ingrid Wuerth and Beth Stephens. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in Benisek v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reason, Damon Root writes that in Kisor v. [read post]