Search for: "Barnett v. Care" Results 81 - 100 of 388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
: The Role of Barnette in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 6:09 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
 Well, there is civil litigation pending against him in Art Cohen v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:21 pm by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) For those who may be interested, I have written an amicus brief in Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:09 am by Ilya Somin
In addition, the other states could try to establish standing by relying on the broad theories of state standing endorsed by the Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:11 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) In an earlier post, Orin compares the current challenges to the constitutionality of the individual insurance mandate to debates on this blog over the case of McDonald v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Burwell How the IRS repeatedly rewrites Obamacare tax credit provisions as documented by UIowa’s Andy Grewal (with another example here) On the origins of “established by the State” in the Affordable Care Act Obama says King v. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 10:23 am
Jack notes below the "inevitable" move of those opposed to reform of our medical care (or, for many, medical non-care) system to the plane of constitutional law. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 5:23 am by Gilbert Holmes
Barnette (children forced to say the pledge of allegiance), the U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 2:57 am
Levinson then opines that Whittington's view suffers from the defect that the only judges who feel licensed to care what the framer's thought are members of the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:10 am by Marissa Miller
This weekend’s coverage focused on the President’s comments on the Court and the Affordable Care Act, the fallout from those comments, and last week’s opinion in Florence v. [read post]