Search for: "Barnett v. George" Results 81 - 100 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
  Finally, I'll also explain why the article's new account of the original understanding of the Necessary and Proper Clause can serve as a useful framework for addressing some of the issues presented in Bond v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
This modern “rational basis” review originated in the 1955 case of Williamson v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 11:43 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) Last week, I joined with Michael Ramsey (San Diego) Michael Rappaport (San Diego), Chris Green (Mississippi), Gary Lawson (Boston University), John McGinnis (Northwestern) and Todd Zywicki (George Mason) on an amicus Brief of Originalist Scholars in NLRB v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:51 pm by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
 This year the competition focuses on National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 8:48 am by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
 Randy Barnett, Michael Carvin, Gregory Katsas, Erin Murphy, Alan Morrison, Paul Smith, and I will provide a look back at the litigation in NFIB v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am by Allison Trzop
”  In Michigan, reports George Hunter in The Detroit News, a federal judge has stayed his decision in a challenge to the state’s ban on adoption by same-sex partners pending the Court’s decisions in Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am by INFORRM
The online site also include an article by Professor Steven Barnett, ‘Public Interest: the public decides‘. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:34 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) I have been following the reaction to Judge Janice Rogers Brown and Chief Judge David Sentelle’s concurring opinion in Hettinga v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
In 2000, the court was again in the spotlight, deciding the presidential election in favor of Republican George W. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am by Rob Robinson
§ 1920 (PDF) t.co/f6HHAi9a (Latham & Watkins) No Resolution Reached in Pippins v. [read post]