Search for: "Barrett v. People"
Results 81 - 100
of 844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 11:45 am
With Thomas and the Trump trio – Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett – this is the crew that struck down Roe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
Alito’s confirmation in 2006 kicked off a shift to the right that accelerated with the arrival of three justices – Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett – nominated by former President Donald Trump. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Because the government now agrees with petitioner Paul Erlinger that judges cannot constitutionally make that finding, the court appointed Nick Harper, former clerk to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, to argue in support of the judgment below. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
Nobody has had the … chutzpah, to quote my people, to bring it up since Atlas Roofing. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
" That referred to then-Judge Barrett's dissent in Kanter v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm
(The New York Times picked up Justice Barrett's question). [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
From the moment the Supreme Court granted cert in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:47 pm
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
" Bruen continues, "In other words, this 19th-century evidence was 'treated as mere confirmation of what the Court thought had already been established.'" See also Justice Barrett's concurrence in Bruen, quoting Espinoza v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
But in Lindke v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am
For instance, then-Seventh-Circuit-Judge Barrett has derived from the historical sources a basic principle that "legislatures have the power to prohibit dangerous people from possessing guns. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Nonetheless, there is reason to hope that Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett—who fully joined Justice Gorsuch’s opinion in Whole Woman’s Health but did not join his statement in Missouri v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 11:54 am
As Justice Barrett explained in Biden v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In all likelihood, additional conservatives on today's Court also would have broken from Scalia in that case.I also tend to think that Justice Scalia would not have joined Justice Barrett's four-Justice Nance v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 1:35 pm
” Justice Amy Coney Barrett also appeared sympathetic to Unikowsky’s argument that the court should not dismiss the case. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
It is asking the Court to overturn the Supreme Court’s 1984 landmark decision in Chevron v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
Sackett v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm
” Even Justice Barrett, who sees the major questions doctrine as an ambiguity canon rather than a clear statement rule, focuses not on Congress but the Executive when applying it in her Biden v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
