Search for: "Bartlett v. State of California"
Results 81 - 100
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
De Grandy and Bartlett v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm
United States, and then, in two consolidated cases, Stitt and Sims v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
The California state law at issue in Flagstar Bank v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:17 am
The 6-3 ruling in California v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
S. 681, 700, n. 33 (1997) , or when the question sought to be adjudicated has been mooted by subsequent developments, California v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Scott Michelman, of California (Jay Rorty, of California, & John Reinstein with him) for the defendant. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
Russell Bartlett was arrested for disorderly conduct and harassment. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 2:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
Hall, which held that one state can open the doors of its courts to a private citizen’s lawsuit against another state without its consent: Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:27 am
Birnbaum, Jina Choi, and Haimavatha V. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:27 am
Birnbaum, Jina Choi, and Haimavatha V. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Bartlett, The Reserve Mining Controversy (1980). [4] Reserve Mining Co v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaDocket: 09-1254Issue(s): (1) Whether, in enacting a state statute extending the statute of limitations applicable to claims for the recovery of property stolen during the Holocaust against museums and galleries, the State of California was addressing an area of “traditional state responsibility” without intruding on the federal foreign affairs power; (2) whether a state statute extending the statute of… [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
California Teachers Association, 14-915, a case that was also affirmed by an equally divided Court. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 7:34 am
This follows the recent decision of King v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:34 pm
This follows the recent decision of King v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
[but] in a general sense, the principles of comment k relate to the negligence concepts.Toner, 732 P.2d at 310-11 (various citations omitted).Toner relied heavily on then-California law, as decided by intermediate California courts, especially Kearl v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
Posted by David Katz and Sabastian V. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:06 am
Speaking at Iona College in New York Tuesday, Justice Antonin Scalia said critics of the Bush v. [read post]
