Search for: "Bates v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
The Recalibration of Colonel Brock: D.C. Circuit Ruling for J6 Rioter Could Impact Hundreds of Cases
3 Mar 2024, 4:01 am
Here is the opinion: United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 3:05 am
The Supreme Court of the United States recently granted certiorari in Stanley v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:13 am
Bates v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:04 pm
The degree of control the United States exercises at Bagram is also not illuminating, as both Judge Bates and the Court of Appeals have rejected the notion that construction activities are relevant to the jurisdictional calculus. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am
Bates rules on two matters. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:22 am
United States, in which the justices considered the scope of tribal fishing rights, comes from Miriam Seifter. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
State Bar 19 Cal. 3d 359 (1977) and Bates v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
That is what happened in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 5:55 am
Five years ago today, white supremacist extremists from across the United States traveled to Charlottesville, Virginia for the “Unite the Right” rally. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 11:47 am
United States, Maurer identified an argument that the parties, the amici, and the court did not make. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:55 am
Bates of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of whistleblower Alfred Winder, holding that the 2009 amendment to the D.C. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:16 am
§ 437g(a)(8)(A), which states that "Any party aggrieved by an order of the Commission dismissing a complaint filed by such party ... may file a petition with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Board Decision and Girl Scouts of the United States” Commentator: Martha Jones Closing Comments: Sarah Barringer Gordon [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W (Algeria) and BB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z (Algeria), G (Algeria),U (Algeria) and Y (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:02 am
United States, a case about whether property owners are entitled to a jury when the federal government takes their land,” arguing that “[a] jury is key when it comes to compensation questions because the government has an obvious conflict of interest in appraising ‘fair’ market value. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
This type of situation is what the Supreme Court was talking about in Bates v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
First, section 1021 of the NDAA “affirm[ed]” the AUMF’s grant of authority for: Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b)) pending disposition under the laws of war. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
United States, which asks whether a driver has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a rental car when he is not an authorized driver. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:52 pm
’” Bd. of Trs. of State Univ. of N.Y. v. [read post]
