Search for: "Batson v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2015, 7:47 am
United States (PDF). [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:24 am
Being a reader of the Amsterdam Daily News, which describes itself as "one of New York's largest and most influential Black-owned and operated business institutions" and which has a circulation of about 25,000, is a legitimate ground for exercising a peremptory challenge against an African-American jury panel member, the Second Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 7:10 pm
Addressing Berry's reliance on the United States Supreme Court's recent grant of certiorari in Baze v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 8:22 am
” Thomas is also a longtime critic of the Court’s interpretation of federal power over interstate commerce, most notably in his concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:21 am
State: I'll have to re-read Batson. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a court can freeze a criminal defendant’s “untainted” assets when the defendant’s “tainted” assets have been spent or cannot be located. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 6:52 pm
" United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court can’t seem to make up its mind about race. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 3:38 am
In so doing, the Court disregards the rule that “[w]e do not grant a certiorari to review evidence and discuss specific facts,” United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 2:13 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:26 pm
Well, it all goes back to a 1986 United States Supreme Court decision, Batson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Here is what Justice Ginsburg wrote: Montana’s experience, and experience elsewhere since this Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
A 1986 case, Batson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 1:38 pm
The Mississippi Supreme Court reversed again, this time because of a violation of Batson v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm
” Thus, Urbanski stressed, the only question a federal habeas court should ask is whether that determination “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 2:33 am
United States, the Justices will consider the scope of a federal ten-year mandatory minimum sentence enhancement for a man who pleaded guilty to the possession of child pornography. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:07 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:07 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
