Search for: "Battle v. Harris" Results 81 - 100 of 445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm by Brian Shiffrin
"Yet, in an indirect way, the decision of the New York Court of Appeals in People v Battles (_NY3d_, 2010 NY Slip Op 09160 [12/14/10]), in which that Court once again rejected a challenge to the constitutionality of New York's persistent Felony Offender sentencing laws, suggests that Portalatin is not necessarily the last word on this issue. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 1:42 pm by Angela Swan
See Barbour v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Bankers Trust Co., 60 NY2d 155 (refusing to enforce oral agreement that contradicted the terms of the parties' written agreement); Harris v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Anti-busing demonstrators shouting at policemen at City Hall in New York, Sept. 24, 1964, as they protested a Board of Education busing program aimed at increasing racial balance in New York City schools.Credit…Harry Harris/Associated Press As a 2020 study in Time Magazine noted, today, the battle is far from over. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:57 am by Karen Hoffmann
Today the Supreme Court is conferencing to decide whether to grant a writ of certiorari in the case of Castro v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am by Joshua Matz
Harris that the Federal Meat Inspection Act preempts a California state law, and expresses concern that current regulations are inadequate . [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:50 am by Joy Waltemath
Many labor and employment practitioners expected the Justices to take on the issue in the wake of the Court’s Harris v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 7:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Cuomo (2020) (Gorsuch, J., concurring) (stating that Jacobson essentially applied a rational basis standard); Harris v. [read post]