Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 8,250
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2024, 3:00 am by Greg Lambert
The conversation emphasizes the importance of authenticating videos, especially in the news media, and the ongoing battle between deep fake creators and forensic experts. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:49 am by Barbara Lichman
On June 28, 2024, the United States Supreme Court sent a long, cold shiver through the ranks of Federal agencies in its landmark decision in the case of Loper Bright v. [read post]
This lawsuit marks the beginning of what could be a significant legal battle over the separation of church and state, with the outcome having the potential to have far-reaching implications. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 8:31 am by David Greene
We filed our first amicus brief in November 2018: https://www.eff.org/document/prager-university-v-google-eff-amicus-brief   EFF’s must-carry laws issue page: https://www.eff.org/cases/netchoice-must-carry-litigation  Press release for our SCOTUS amicus brief: https://www.eff.org/press/releases/landmark-battle-over-free-speech-eff-urges-supreme-court-strike-down-texas-and  Direct link to our brief:… [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am by INFORRM
The agreement will free Assange and end the years long legal battle over the publication of classified documents. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:36 am by Nedim Malovic
Aslan had infringed the marks in question and ordered each party to bear its own costs.CommentBrand owners know that the battle against counterfeiting and piracy remains a challenging one. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[1] Thus, for example, Graber showed, among his many other myth-busting insights, that Marbury v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 3:12 am by Dylan Gibbs
So they’re teaming up for another legal battle with the feds: "Alberta Premier Danielle Smith calls the bill “draconian,” while Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe calls it censorship against the oil and gas industry. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm by Eric Goldman
The court says Coursera’s process provided reasonable notice to the plaintiff: the language in the email is reasonably conspicuous because the header clearly states that the email included updates to the TOU, the TOU hyperlink is in blue font and stands out from the remaining text, and the hyperlink is followed by a description of the TOU which specifically calls out “[u]pdated arbitration language. [read post]