Search for: "Battles v. Social Security Administration"
Results 81 - 100
of 275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm
Some justices were clearly concerned that striking down the removal restrictions could have significant and undesirable ripple effects – calling into question, for example, the validity of the Social Security Administration’s leadership structure. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
- elderly retirees who do not have the Social Security benefits they would have received if their spouse were of the opposite sex [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:31 am
John, 597 F.3d 263, (5th Cir. 2010)); a Social Security Administration employee who accessed former girlfriends' addresses to solicit their affections (United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
R. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:41 am
After much national and international uproar at these blatant violations of human rights, the Supreme Court finally ruled five to three in Hamdan v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
The most striking legal story of the week was the reporting of the Administrative Court’s ruling on Article 50 and the Royal Prerogative ([2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin)). [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am
In a letter to House and Senate, Austin and Blinken said the administration needs the money by then “if we are to continue are security assistance at the current pace. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm
So how do we get tech companies to start fighting surveillance in court, hardening their systems against surveillance, pushing back against the administration, and lobbying for real reform? [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 1. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 6:29 am
Trump’s top legal counsel assessment of need to return documents to Archives: “The Archives battle to secure records from Trump began while he was still president, according to records reviewed by The Post. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
“It must gnaw at his innards,” he said of his friend, “that the administration he is serving is attempting to do this kind of damage to institutions that are so important to the security of our great nation. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 10:35 am
Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Wade, taking on Griswold v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 10:00 pm
It's an important social issue. [read post]
17 May 2020, 8:14 am
The second was the legalization of the administration of these norm systems. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
The Trump Administration lost another round in its battle in Doe 1 v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
Not that the battle isn’t worthy of all of the attention and hype; it is. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 1:39 pm
On July 21, 2015, Senators Edward Markey (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) proposed legislation (S. 1806) requiring the Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to team with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to establish certain consumer data privacy and car computer network security rules to prevent hacking in all motor vehicles manufactured for sale in the U.S. [read post]
