Search for: "Beach v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2013, 11:31 am
Last year, the Texas Supreme Court decided a case interpreting the Open Beaches Act, Severance v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 3:33 pm
In Kitroser v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:39 pm
” The decision in Pass-A-Grille Beach Community Church, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Supreme Court case of United States ex rel Touhy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 8:58 am
NRDC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 5:44 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF; merit briefs] Wednesday in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:05 pm
United States, and Graham v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 9:09 am
Can Hawai'i require a cheap, easily-obtained permit before commerical users can perform weddings on public beaches (and impose minimal regulations thereupon)? [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
The sheriff has a policy of not enforcing state trespass laws within twenty feet of the wet sand beach's edge. [read post]
23 May 2008, 6:31 pm
Registration for the 26th Annual Family Law Institute began at 7:30 at the Sandestin Beach Hilton and I greeted many of my colleagues from Atlanta and others from throughout the State of Georgia. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:22 am
Chan v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 5:48 pm
The story notes Hawaii's Diamond v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:15 pm
Ani Creation, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 9:34 am
Gibson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:53 pm
Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:16 am
Today, April 19, 2011, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral argument on rehearing in a case styled Severance v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:01 am
In Lozman v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 8:11 pm
The Case of McCall v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:11 pm
The passage of the new legislative amendments will effectively supersede the holding in Strouse v. [read post]